Part 1
# The Holyhead Road: The Mail-coach Road to Dublin. Vol. 2 ### By Harper, Charles G. (Charles George)
---
Produced by Richard Tonsing, Chris Curnow and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
THE HOLYHEAD ROAD
[Illustration: EARLY DAYS ON THE LONDON AND BIRMINGHAM RAILWAY.]
THE HOLYHEAD ROAD: THE MAIL-COACH ROAD TO DUBLIN
By CHARLES G. HARPER
Author of “_The Brighton Road_,” “_The Portsmouth Road_,” “_The Dover Road_,” “_The Bath Road_,” “_The Exeter Road_,” “_The Great North Road_,” and “_The Norwich Road_”
[Illustration]
_Illustrated by the Author, and from Old-Time Prints and Pictures_
_Vol. II. BIRMINGHAM TO HOLYHEAD_
LONDON: CHAPMAN & HALL LTD. 1902
[_All rights reserved_]
PRINTED BY HAZELL, WATSON, AND VINEY, LD. LONDON AND AYLESBURY.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Illustration]
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
SEPARATE PLATES
PAGE
EARLY DAYS ON THE LONDON AND BIRMINGHAM RAILWAY. _Frontispiece_
BULL RING. (_From a Print after David Cox_) 5
OLD BIRMINGHAM COACHING BILL. 13
DUDLEY. (_After J. M. W. Turner, R.A._) 31
HIGH GREEN, WOLVERHAMPTON, 1797. (_After Rowlandson_) 47
HIGH GREEN, WOLVERHAMPTON, 1826. (_From an Old Print_) 51
HIGH GREEN, WOLVERHAMPTON, 1860. (_From a Contemporary Photograph_) 55
SHIFFNAL. 67
THE COUNCIL HOUSE. 141
THE HONOURABLE THOMAS KENYON. (_From an Old Print_) 153
THE VALE OF LLANGOLLEN. 177
LLANGOLLEN. 183
LLANGOLLEN. (_After J. M. W. Turner, R. A._) 187
VALLE CRUCIS ABBEY. (_After J. M. W. Turner, R.A._) 207
CERNIOGE. 227
THE SWALLOW FALLS. (_From an Old Print_) 247
LLYN OGWEN AND TRIFAEN MOUNTAIN. 255
PENMAENMAWR. (_After J. M. W. Turner, R.A._) 275
THE OLD LANDING-PLACE ON THE ANGLESEY SHORE. 283
ILLUSTRATIONS IN TEXT
Vignette: Prince Rupert _Title Page_
List of Illustrations: The Black Country vii
The Holyhead Road 1
The “Hen and Chickens,” 1830 18
The “Old Royal” 24
Wednesbury 37
Old Hill, Tettenhall 59
The Sabbath-breaking Seamstress 60
Snedshill Furnaces 71
Haygate Inn 76
The Wrekin 79
The “Old Wall” 84
Wroxeter Church 85
Atcham Bridge 91
Lord Hill’s Monument 92
The English Bridge 97
Wyle Cop and the “Lion” 107
The “Lion” Yard 132
The Market-Place, Shrewsbury 138
Shelton Oak 144
The Breidden Hills 147
Queen’s Head 156
Offa’s Dyke 176
The Ladies of Llangollen. (_From an Old Print_) 198
Plas Newydd 203
Owain Glyndwr’s Mount 211
Cerrig-y-Druidion 224
The Waterloo Bridge 232
The Old Church, Bettws-y-Coed 234
Sign of the “Royal Oak” 238
Pont-y-Pair 245
Cyfyng Falls 250
Capel Curig 252
The Falls of Ogwen 257
Nant Ffrancon. (_After David Cox_) 258
Nant Ffrancon 260
Penrhyn Castle 263
Lonisaf Toll-House 264
The Penrhyn Arms 266
Penrhyn Castle and Snowdonia, from Beaumaris. (_After David Cox_) 278
Deserted Stables, Menai Village 290
The Menai Bridge and the Isle of Benglas 291
The Anglesey Column 296
The Britannia Bridge 299
Near Mona Inn 303
Llangristiolus 304
Caer Ceiliog 306
The South Stack. (_After T. Creswick, R.A._) 323
Holyhead Mountain 325
THE HOLYHEAD ROAD
BIRMINGHAM TO HOLYHEAD
MILES Birmingham (General Post Office) 109¼ Hockley 110½ Soho 111¼ Handsworth 111¾ West Bromwich 114½ Hilltop 116 Wednesbury 117¼ Moxley 118½ Bilston 119½ Wolverhampton 122¼ Chapel Ash 122¾ Tettenhall 124 The Wergs 125¼ Boningale 129½ Whiston Cross 130¼ Shiffnal 134¼ Prior’s Lee 137½ Ketley 139 Ketley Railway Station 139½ (Junction of Watling Street with Holyhead Road.) Wellington (“Cock”) 140½ Haygate 141½ Burcot Toll-House 143 Norton 146½ Tern Bridge 147½ (Cross River Tern.) Atcham 148¼ (Cross River Severn.) Shrewsbury (Abbey Foregate) 151¼ (Cross River Severn.) Shrewsbury (Market House) 152 Shrewsbury (Welsh Bridge and Frankwell) 152¼ (Cross River Severn.) Shelton Oak 154 Bicton 154½ Montford Bridge 156¾ (Cross River Severn.) Nesscliff 160½ West Felton 165¼ Queen’s Head 166¼ Oswestry 170 Gobowen 172¾ Chirk 175 (Cross River Ceiriog.) Whitehurst Toll-House 177 Vron Cysylltan 179¾ Llangollen 182½ Berwyn Railway Station 184¼ Glyndyfrdwy 188 Carrog 189 Corwen 192½ (Cross River Dee.) Maerdy Post Office 196 Pont-y-Glyn 197¾ Tynant 198¼ Cerrig-y-Druidion 202 Glasfryn 204½ Cernioge 205¾ Pentre Voelas 207¾ Bettws-y-Coed 214½ (Cross River Conway) Swallow Falls 216 Cyfyng Falls 218½ Tan-y-Bwlch 219 Capel Curig 220 Llyn Ogwen 224 Ogwen Falls} 225 Pass of Nant Ffrancon} Tyn-y-Maes 228 Bethesda 229¼ Llandegai 232¾ Bangor (Cathedral) 234½ Upper Bangor 236 Menai Bridge 237 (Cross Menai Straits) Menai Village 237¼ Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerchwyrndrobwlltysiliogogogoch 239¼ Gaerwen 242½ Pentre Berw (Holland Arms) 243 Llangristiolus 245½ Mona 247½ Gwalchmai 249¾ Bryngwran 252½ Caer Ceiliog 255 Valley 256 Stanley Sands 256¼ (Cross Stanley Sands Viaduct to Holy Island) Holyhead (Admiralty Pier) 260½
THE OLD ROAD FROM MENAI VILLAGE TO HOLYHEAD
MILES Menai Village 237¼ Braint 239½ Ceint 242½ Llangefni 244¾ Bodffordd 247 Gwyndû and Glanyrafon 249¾ Llynfaes 250¼ Trefor 251¼ Bodedern 254 Llanyngenedl 255¼ Valley and Four-Mile Bridge 258¼ Trearddur Bay 261½ (Cross Causeway over Straits to Holy Island) Holyhead 263½
[Illustration: The Holyhead Road]
BIRMINGHAM TO HOLYHEAD
I
There are said to be no fewer than a hundred and forty different ways of spelling the name of Birmingham, all duly vouched for by old usage; but it is not proposed in these pages to recount them, or to follow the arguments of those who have contended for its derivation from “Bromwicham.” It is singular that in the first mention we have of the place, in Domesday Book, it is spelt “Bermingham,” almost exactly as it is to-day, and this lends much authority to the view that we get the place-name from an ancient Saxon tribe or family of Beormingas.
When the original Beormingas, the Sons of Beorm (whoever he may have been), settled here, in the dim Saxon past, they founded better than they knew; but they chose a hill-top, a place where no river runs, unless we choose thus to dignify the little stream called the Rea. This lack of watercourses mattered nothing at all to mediæval Birmingham, but when, in spite of all disabilities, the place rose into commercial importance, the want began to be severely felt, and herculean have been the efforts in modern times to effect a proper water-supply.
Little but scattered mention is heard of Birmingham and its smiths before the Civil War, but when that struggle broke out, they were heard of to some purpose. Its 4000 inhabitants in 1643 were Puritans to a man, and warlike. They furnished 15,000 sword-blades for Cromwell’s troops, and at a convenient opportunity waylaid the King’s carriage and seized it, his furniture, and his plate. For these enormities Prince Rupert came later from Daventry and punished them severely in a battle on Camp Hill, overlooking the town. Many Birmingham men were slain that day, and eighty houses burnt; the whole affair piteously related in a tract of that time called “The Bloody Prince; or, a Declaration of the Most Cruell Practises of Prince Rupert and the rest of the Cavaliers, in fighting against God and the true Ministers of his Church.” A woodcut intended to portray that sanguinary Prince appears on the cover, with Birmingham flaming furiously in the background; Daventry in the rear. The rest of the Cavaliers appear to be manœuvring somewhere else; at any rate, Rupert is alone, on horseback, with a mild expression of countenance and a big pistol.
Twenty-two years later the Plague depopulated the town, but in another twenty-three years it had grown to double its former size, and by 1791 numbered between 70,000 and 80,000. Yet it had no Parliamentary representation until 1832.
That Birmingham is seated on a hill is not so evident to railway travellers, but he who comes to it by road is well advised of the fact at Bull Ring, where the hilly entrance confronts him. Bull Ring is old Birmingham of a hundred years and more ago; the nucleus of the town, and little altered since David Cox drew his picture of the market there. The market remains, but there has come about since his day an extraordinary popular appreciation of the beauty of flowers, so that, instead of the fowls pictured largely in his view, the crowded stalls are radiant with blooms of every sort; cut flowers, and growing plants.
Here stands, as ever, St. Martin’s, the mother-church of Birmingham, where the ancient manorial lords of the place lie; those de Berminghams whose last representative was choused out of his rights in 1545. Here is that statue of Nelson for whose proper cleansing a patriotic tradesman left by will sixpence a week; and here occurred the Wesley riots of 1742 and the Chartist Riot of 1839. When Charles Wesley sought to preach, the people set the church bells a-ringing to drown his voice, and then began to pelt him with dirt and turnips; but the political riot was a much more serious affair, resulting in the pillaging of shops and houses, and immense damage.
II
In Birmingham, close upon four hundred years ago, Leland found but one street, yet that street was full of smiths, making knives and “all manner of cuttinge tooles, and many loriners that make bittes, and a great many naylors. Soe that a great part of the towne is maintained by smithes, who have their iron and sea-cole out of Staffordshire.”
Not only has Birmingham grown out of all knowledge since that time, but it has largely changed its trades. Sheffield has taken away the pick of the cutlery trade, and that of the loriners has its chief seat at Walsall; but Birmingham now makes everything, from a monster engine to a pin’s head, and in the murderous art of manufacturing fire-arms is pre-eminent.
“She is,” observed an enthusiastic writer, “in the truest sense the benefactress of the universal man, from the crowned head to the savage of the wilderness.” To the crowned heads, for example—or to their governments—Birmingham supplies stands of arms and ammunition; and to the savage, guns warranted to hurt no one but he who uses them. Civilisation is thus heavily indebted to Birmingham, and religion too; for if the heathen, who “in his blindness bows down to wood and stone,” is no longer restricted to those two materials, by reason of Birmingham industriously supplying little tin and brass gods by wholesale, and at extremely low prices, to Africa or India, yet on Sundays the godly folks of her hundred churches and chapels liberally subscribe to missionary funds for spreading Christianity in strange lands, and thus help to discredit the heathen Vishnus, Sivas, Hanumans, and assorted Mumbo-Jumbos they export.
[Illustration: BULL RING. _From a Print after David Cox._]
“Birmingham,” said Burke, a hundred years ago, “is the toyshop of Europe.” Fancy articles in steel and paste; buckles, sword-hilts, buttons, and a thousand other trifles were made, for home or export; among them the sham, or “Brummagem” jewellery, and the base coin that long cast a slur upon the town. Things coming from Birmingham were in those times rightly suspect. One of its industries was the making of “silver” buckles of a villainous kind of cheap white metal, called from its nature “soft tommy.” A tale is told of the owner of the factory where this precious stuff was made up, going through one of the workshops and hearing a workman cursing the man who would chance to wear the pair of buckles he was making.
“Why,” asked the astonished employer, “do you do that?”
“Well,” replied the workman, “whoever wears these buckles is bound to curse the man that made them, and so I thought I would be the first.”
Those were the days when it was said that if you gave a guinea and a copper kettle to a Birmingham manufacturing jeweller he would turn you out a hundred guineas’ worth of jewellery!
Things are very different now. The trades of Birmingham seem almost countless in their number; many of them conducted on a scale large enough for each one to suffice a small township of workers. Brass-founding, tube-making, gun-smithing, pin-making, wire-drawing, screw-turning, gold-smithing, electro-plating, tinplate working, coining (in the legitimate kind), steel pen-making—these are but a few of the countless industries to whose skirts clings for livelihood a population of half a million.
When Mr. Pickwick visited Birmingham, he repaired to the “Old Royal” hotel. Where is the “Old Royal” now? Ask of the winds—nay, consult the histories of Birmingham, and you shall learn. But if the old hotel and many of its fellows be gone, at least the description of the entrance to the town holds good, and “the dingy hue of every object visible, the murky atmosphere, the paths of cinders and brick-dust” are phrases that awake echoes of recollection in the breasts of those who know the town of old: but “the dense smoke issuing heavily forth from high toppling chimneys, blackening and obscuring everything around,” is not so descriptive of the Birmingham of to-day. For fully realising that picture, and the added touches of the “deep red glow of furnace fires, the glare of distant lights, the ponderous wagons laden with clashing rods of iron, or piled with heavy goods,” one must journey to Dudley, where such things may be seen and heard in a hellish crescendo: Birmingham has largely put those things in the background. In Mr. Pickwick’s time “the hum of labour resounded from every house, lights gleamed from the long casement windows in the attic storeys, and the whirr of wheels and noise of machinery shook the trembling walls, and the din of hammers, the rushing of steam, and the dead, heavy clanking of engines was the harsh music that arose from every quarter”; but most of these things are nowadays decently hid in purlieus remote, or masked from the chief streets by the towering modern buildings of hotels, banks, assurance offices, and all the hundred-and-one parasitical things of a limited liability age, that fasten like vermin on the producing body.
Birmingham became a City on January 11th, 1889. It is a City of two fine streets, surrounded by many miles of formless, featureless, dull and commonplace (or, at their worst, hideous and squalid) houses, workshops, and factories of every size and description. New Street was only new at a period over a century ago. Corporation Street was formed in 1871 by boldly cutting through a mass of slums. In those two thoroughfares, and the open space by the Town Hall to which they both lead, is included almost everything of architectural note. In their course are to be found the best and most attractive shops, and the principal banks and commercial offices. The rest is merely of a local and provincial character.
The geographical, municipal, and political centre is, of course, that spot where the Town Hall stands, a grim and massive building in the Corinthian style, with that air of age and permanency about its rusticated basement, as though when the Anglo-Saxons came they had found it here, the relic of an ancient civilisation. But the Town Hall can lay no claim to antiquity, built as it was in 1832. Around it, in an open space of a singularly irregular shape, are the General Post Office, the Art Gallery, the great Free Library, and other municipal buildings proper to a city so rich and prosperous; and, scattered about the pavements, a miscellaneous collection of statues, facing towards New Street Station, as though they formed some kind of deputation assembled there to welcome visitors. It is a very oddly assorted crowd, captained by Queen Victoria, and formed of such varied items as Joseph Priestley (who with his burning glass looks as though he were critically examining a bad coin), Peel, John Skirrow, Wright, George Dawson, James Watt, and Sir Josiah Mason. In the little corner called Chamberlain Square the curious will find a monument to the energy and enterprise (the “pushfulness” as those who love him not might call it) of Joseph Chamberlain, without whose work and initiative Birmingham would not own, as it does to-day, its gas, water, and tramways, and could not show such evidences of progress in new and handsome streets and model government.
It is a far cry from the Red Radical days of Birmingham’s great Mayor in 1874 to those of the Colonial Secretary, a pillar of the Empire and the darling of Duchesses. Perhaps no other man has, politically, travelled so far, estranged so many friends, or made such strangely alien alliances, with the result that his sheaf has been exalted over his brethren these years past. Hence the extreme bitterness of the hatred his name arouses in certain circles.
The memorial to his work on the comparatively small stage of Birmingham, before he trod the boards of Westminster, takes the form of a Gothic canopied fountain, with a profile portrait medallion, whereon one may trace in the aggressive, sharp-pointed nose a striking likeness to William Pitt, and that suggestion of the crafty fox the venomous caricaturists of a later day have seized and used to such advantage.
III
Sir William Dugdale, in his diary, under date of July 16th, 1679, mentions the first Birmingham coach we have any notice of. He says, “I came out of London by the stage-coach of Bermicham to Banbury.” That is all we learn of specifically Birmingham coaches until 1731, when Rothwell’s began to ply to London in two days and a half, according to the old coaching bill still preserved.
Afterwards came the Flying Coach of 1742, followed in 1758 by an “improved Birmingham Coach,” with the legend “Friction Annihilated” prominent on the axle-boxes. This the _Annual Register_ declared to be “perhaps the most useful invention in mechanics this age has produced.” Much virtue lingered in that “perhaps,” for nothing more was heard of that wonderful device.
In 1812 the Post Office established a Birmingham Mail, and great was the local rejoicing on May 26th, when, attended by eight mail-guards in full uniform, adorned with blue ribbons, it paraded the streets. After two hours’ procession, when coachman and guards were feasted with wine, biscuits, and sandwiches, the Mail set out for London from the “Swan” Hotel, amid the ringing of St. Martin’s bells and the cheering of the assembled thousands.
Eight years later it was estimated that Birmingham owned eighty-four coaches. Forty of these were daily, and most plied on bye-roads.
[Illustration: OLD BIRMINGHAM COACHING BILL.]
BIRMINGHAM STAGE-COACH, In Two _Days_ and a half; begins _May_ the 24th, 1731.
SETS out from the _Swan-Inn_ in _Birmingham_, every _Monday_ at six a Clock in the Morning, through _Warwick_, _Banbury_ and _Alesbury_, to the _Red Lion Inn_ in _Aldersgate street_, _London_, every _Wednesday_ Morning: And returns from the said _Red Lion Inn_ every _Thursday_ Morning at five a Clock the same Way to the _Swan-Inn_ in _Birmingham_ every _Saturday_, at 21 Shillings each Passenger, and 18 Shillings from _Warwick_, who has liberty to carry 14 Pounds in Weight, and all above to _pay One Penny a Pound_.
Perform d (if God permit)
By Nicholas Rothwell.
_The_ Weekly Waggon _sets out every Tuesday from the Nagg’s-Head in Birmingham, to the_ Red Lion Inn _aforesaid, every Saturday, and returns from the said Inn every Monday, to the Nagg’s-Head in Birmingham every Thursday._
_Note. By the said_ Nicholas Rothwell _of_ Warwick, _all Persons may be furnished with a By Coach Chariot, Chaise or Hearse, with a Mourning Coach and able Horses, to any Part of Great Britain, at reasonable Rates And also Saddle Horses to be had._
* * * * *
From 1822 to 1826 Birmingham witnessed a great improvement in its coaches. Waddell owned the two most prominent yards in the town, but had many ardent competitors. In 1822 the “Tally-ho” was established, shortly to be followed by the hotly competing “Independent,” “Real,” and “Patent” Tally-hoes. Supposed to keep a pace of ten miles an hour, they no sooner left the town behind than they started racing, to the terror of the nervous and the delight of the sporting passengers. Annually, on the First of May, they were spurred to superhuman and super-equine exertions, and, we are told, covered the hundred and eight miles between Birmingham and London “under seven hours.” How much under is not stated, but as an even seven hours gives us fifteen miles an hour, including stops, the pace must have been furious. Harry Tresslove, the coachman of the “Independent Tally Ho,” always galloped the five-mile stage between Dunchurch and the “Black Dog,” Stretton-upon-Dunsmore, in eighteen minutes.
The existence of all stage-coaches being furiously competitive, they could not afford to be quiet and plain, like the Mails. “Once I remember,” says De Quincey, “being on the top of the Holyhead Mail between Shrewsbury and Oswestry, when a tawdry thing from Birmingham, some ‘Tally-ho’ or ‘Highflyer,’ all flaunting with green and gold, came up alongside of us. What a contrast with our royal simplicity of form and colour in this plebeian wretch! The single ornament on our dark ground of chocolate colour was the mighty shield of the Imperial arms, but emblazoned in proportion as modest as a signet-ring bears to a seal of office. Even this was displayed only on a single panel, whispering, rather than proclaiming, our relations to the mighty State; whilst the beast from Birmingham, our green-and-gold friend from false, fleeting, perjured Brummagem, had as much writing and painting on its sprawling flanks as would have puzzled a decipherer from the tombs of Luxor. For some time this Birmingham machine ran along by our side—a piece of familiarity that already of itself seemed to me sufficiently Jacobinical. But all at once a movement of the horses announced a desperate intention of leaving us behind. ‘Do you see _that_?’ I said to the coachman. ‘I see,’ was his short answer. He was wide awake, yet he waited longer than seemed prudent, for the horses of our audacious opponent had a disagreeable air of freshness and power. But his motive was loyal; his wish was that the Birmingham conceit should be full-blown before he froze it. When that seemed right he unloosed, or, to speak by a stronger word, he _sprang_ his unknown resources: he slipped our Royal horses like cheetahs, or hunting-leopards, after the affrighted game. How they could retain such a reserve of fiery power after the work they had accomplished seemed hard to explain. But on our side, besides the physical superiority, was a tower of moral strength, namely, the King’s Name. Passing them without an effort, as it seemed, we threw them into the rear with so lengthening an interval between us as proved in itself the bitterest mockery of their presumption; whilst our guard blew back a shattering blast of triumph that was really too painfully full of derision.”
The “Emerald” was a fast night coach between London and Birmingham, “driven,” says Colonel Corbet, in his book, _An Old Coachman’s Chatter_, “by Harry Lee, whose complexion was of a very peculiar colour, almost resembling that of a bullock’s liver—the fruit of strong potations of ‘early purl’ or ‘dog’s nose,’ taken after the exertions of the night and before going to bed.”
The last coach put on the road between London and Birmingham, we are told, on the same authority, was in 1837. It was a very fast day mail, started to run to Birmingham and then on to Crewe, where it transferred mails and passengers to the railway for Liverpool. It was horsed by Sherman, and timed at twelve miles an hour.