CHAPTER I.
GEOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS.
Nearly every civil engineer is familiar with the fact that certain porous soils, such as sand or gravel, absorb water with rapidity, and that the ground composed of them soon dries up after showers. If a well be sunk in such soils, we often penetrate to considerable depths before we meet with water; but this is usually found on our approaching some lower part of the porous formation where it rests on an impervious bed; for here the water, unable to make its way downwards in a direct line, accumulates as in a reservoir, and is ready to ooze out into any opening which may be made, in the same manner as we see the salt water filtrate into and fill any hollow which we dig in the sands of the shore at low tide. A spring, then, is the lowest point or lip of an underground reservoir of water in the stratification. A well, therefore, sunk in such strata will most probably furnish, besides the volume of the spring, an additional supply of water.
The transmission of water through a porous medium being so rapid, we may easily understand why springs are thrown out on the side of a hill, where the upper set of strata consist of chalk, sand, and other permeable substances, whilst those lying beneath are composed of clay or other retentive soils. The only difficulty, indeed, is to explain why the water does not ooze out everywhere along the line of junction of the two formations, so as to form one continuous land-soak, instead of a few springs only, and these oftentimes far distant from each other. The principal cause of such a concentration of the waters at a few points is, first, the existence of inequalities in the upper surface of the impermeable stratum, which lead the water, as valleys do on the external surface of a country, into certain low levels and channels; and secondly, the frequency of rents and fissures, which act as natural drains. That the generality of springs owe their supply to the atmosphere is evident from this, that they vary in the different seasons of the year, becoming languid or entirely ceasing to flow after long droughts, and being again replenished after a continuance of rain. Many of them are probably indebted for the constancy and uniformity of their volume to the great extent of the subterranean reservoirs with which they communicate, and the time required for these to empty themselves by percolation. Such a gradual and regulated discharge is exhibited, though in a less perfect degree, in all great lakes, for these are not sensibly affected in their levels by a sudden shower, but are only slightly raised, and their channels of efflux, instead of being swollen suddenly like the bed of a torrent, carry off the surplus water gradually.
An Artesian well, so called from the province of Artois, in France, is a shaft sunk or bored through impermeable strata, until a water-bearing stratum is tapped, when the water is forced upwards by the hydrostatic pressure due to the superior level at which the rain-water was received.
Among the causes of the failure of Artesian wells, we may mention those numerous rents and faults which abound in some rocks, and the deep ravines and valleys by which many countries are traversed; for when these natural lines of drainage exist, there remains only a small quantity of water to escape by artificial issues. We are also liable to be baffled by the great thickness either of porous or impervious strata, or by the dip of the beds, which may carry off the waters from adjoining high lands to some trough in an opposite direction,--as when the borings are made at the foot of an escarpment where the strata incline inwards, or in a direction opposite to the face of the cliffs.
[Illustration: Effect of Strata on Artesian Well.
Fig. 1.]
[Illustration: Effect of a Fault.
Fig. 2.]
As instances of the way in which the character of the strata may influence the water-bearing capacity of any given locality, we give the following examples, taken from Baldwin Latham's papers on 'The Supply of Water to Towns.' Fig. 1 illustrates the causes which sometimes conduce to a limited supply of water in Artesian wells. Rain descending on the outcrop E F of the porous stratum A, which lies between the impervious stratum B B, will make its appearance in the form of a spring at S; but such spring will not yield any great quantity of water, as the area E F, which receives the rainfall, is limited in its extent. A well sunk at W, in a stratum of the above description, would not be likely to furnish a large supply of water, if any. The effect of a fault is shown in Fig. 2. A spring will in all probability make its appearance at the point S, and give large quantities of water, as the whole body of water flowing through the porous strata A is intercepted by being thrown against the impermeable stratum B. Permeable rock intersected by a dyke and overlying an impermeable stratum is seen in Fig. 3. The water flowing through A, if intersected by a dyke D, will appear at S in the form of a spring, and if the area of A is of large extent, then the spring S will be very copious. As to the depth necessary to bore certain wells, in a case similar to Fig. 4, owing to the fault, a well sunk at A would require to be sunk deeper than the well B, although both wells derive their supply from the same description of strata. If there is any inclination in the water-bearing strata, or if there is a current of water only in one direction, then one of the wells would prove a failure owing to the proximity of the fault, while the other would furnish an abundant supply of water.
[Illustration: Permeable Rock Intersected by a Dyke.
Fig. 3.]
It should be borne in mind that there are two primary geological conditions upon which the quantity of water that may be supplied to the water-bearing strata depends; they are, the extent of superficial area presented by these deposits, by which the quantity of rain-water received on their surface in any given time is determined; and the character and thickness of the strata, as by this the proportion of water that can be absorbed, and the quantity which the whole volume of the permeable strata can transmit, is regulated. The operation of these general principles will constantly vary in accordance with local phenomena, all of which must, in each separate case, be taken into consideration.
[Illustration: Well Depth either side of a Fault.
Fig. 4.]
The mere distance of hills or mountains need not discourage us from making trials; for the waters which fall on these higher lands readily penetrate to great depths through highly-inclined or vertical strata, or through the fissures of shattered rocks; and after flowing for a great distance, must often reascend and be brought up again by other fissures, so as to approach the surface in the lower country. Here they may be concealed beneath a covering of undisturbed horizontal beds, which it may be necessary to pierce in order to reach them. The course of water flowing underground is not strictly analogous to that of rivers on the surface, there being, in the one case, a constant descent from a higher to a lower level from the source of the stream to the sea; whereas, in the other, the water may at one time sink far below the level of the ocean, and afterwards rise again high above it.
For the purposes under consideration, we may range the various strata of which the outer crust of the earth is composed under four heads, namely: 1, drift; 2, alluvion; 3, the tertiary and secondary beds, composed of loose, arenaceous and permeable strata, impervious, argillaceous and marly strata, and thick strata of compact rock, more or less broken up by fissures, as the Norwich red and coralline crag, the Molasse sandstones, the Bagshot sands, the London clay, and the Woolwich beds, in the tertiary division; and the chalk, chalk marl, gault, the greensands, the Wealden clay, and the Hastings sand; the oolites, the has, the Rhætic beds, and Keuper, and the new red sandstone, in the secondary division; and 4, the primary beds, as the magnesian limestone, the lower red sand, and the coal measures, which consist mainly of alternating beds of sandstones and shales with coal.
The first of these divisions, the drift, consisting mainly of sand and gravel, having been formed by the action of flowing water, is very irregular in thickness, and exists frequently in detached masses. This irregularity is due to the inequalities of the surface at the period when the drift was brought down. Hollows then existing would often be filled up, while either none was deposited on level surfaces, or, if deposited, was subsequently removed by denudation. Hence we cannot infer when boring through deposits of this character that the same, or nearly the same, thickness will be found at even a few yards' distance. In valleys this deposit may exist to a great depth, the slopes of hills are frequently covered with drift, which has either been arrested by the elevated surface or brought down from the upper portions of that surface by the action of rain. In the former case the deposits will probably consist of gravel, and in the latter, of the same elements as the hill itself.
The permeability of such beds will, of course, depend wholly upon the nature of the deposit. Some rocks produce deposits through which water percolates readily, while others allow a passage only through such fissures as may exist. Sand and gravel constitute an extremely absorbent medium, while an argillaceous deposit may be wholly impervious. In mountainous districts springs may often be found in the drift; their existence in such formations will, however, depend upon the position and character of the rock strata; thus, if the drift cover an elevated and extensive slope of a nature similar to that of the rocks by which it is formed, springs due to infiltration through this covering will certainly exist near the foot of the slope. Upon the opposite slope, the small spaces which exist between the different beds of rock receive these infiltrations directly, and serve to completely drain the deposit which, in the former case, is, on the contrary, saturated with water. If, however, the foliations or the joints of the rocks afford no issue to the water, whether such a circumstance be due to the character of their formation, or to the stopping up of the issues by the drift itself, these results will not be produced.
It will be obvious how, in this way, by passing under a mass of drift the water descending from the top of hill slopes reappears at their foot in the form of springs. If now we suppose these issues stopped, or covered by an impervious stratum of great thickness, and this stratum pierced by a boring, the water will ascend through this new outlet to a level above that of its original issue, in virtue of the head of water measured from the points at which the infiltration takes place to the point in which it is struck by the boring.
Alluvion, like drift, consists of fragments of various strata carried away and deposited by flowing water; it differs from the latter only in being more extensive and regular, and, generally, in being composed of elements brought from a great distance, and having no analogy with the strata with which it is in contact. Usually it consists of sand, gravel, rolled pebbles, marls or clays. The older deposits often occupy very elevated districts, which they overlie throughout a large extent of surface. At the period when the large rivers were formed, the valleys were filled up with alluvial deposits, which at the present day are covered by vegetable soil, and a rich growth of plants, through which the water percolates more slowly than formerly. The permeability of these deposits allows the water to flow away subterraneously to a great distance from the points at which it enters. Springs are common in the alluvion, and more frequently than in the case of drift, they can be found by boring. As the surface, which is covered by the deposit, is extensive, the water circulates from a distance through permeable strata often overlaid by others that are impervious. If at a considerable distance from the points of infiltration, and at a lower level, a boring be put down, the water will ascend in the bore-hole in virtue of its tendency to place itself in equilibrium. Where the country is open and uninhabited, the water from shallow wells sunk in alluvion is generally found to be good enough and in sufficient quantity for domestic purposes.
The strata of the tertiary and secondary beds, especially the latter, are far more extensive than the preceding, and yield much larger quantities of water. The chalk is the great water-bearing stratum for the larger portion of the south of England. The water in it can be obtained either by means of ordinary shafts, or by Artesian wells bored sometimes to great depths, from which the water will frequently rise to the surface. It should be observed that water does not circulate through the chalk by general permeation of the mass, but through fissures. A rule given by some for the level at which water may be found in this stratum is, "Take the level of the highest source of supply, and that of the lowest to be found. The mean level will be the depth at which water will be found at any intermediate point, after allowing an inclination of at least 10 feet a mile." This rule will also apply to the greensand. This formation contains large quantities of water, which is more evenly distributed than in the chalk. The gault clay is interposed between the upper and the lower greensand, the latter of which also furnishes good supplies. In boring into the upper greensand, caution should be observed so as not to pierce the gault clay, because water which permeates through that system becomes either ferruginous, or contaminated by salts and other impurities.
The next strata in which water is found are the upper and inferior oolites, between which are the Kimmeridge and Oxford clays, which are separated by the coral rag. There are instances in which the Oxford clay is met with immediately below the Kimmeridge, rendering any attempt at boring useless, because the water in the Oxford clay is generally so impure as to be unfit for use. And with regard to finding water in the oolitic limestone, it is impossible to determine with any amount of precision the depth at which it may be reached, owing to the numerous faults which occur in the formation. It will therefore be necessary to employ the greatest care before proceeding with any borings. Lower down in the order are the upper has, the marlstone, the lower has, and the new red sandstone. In the marlstone, between the upper and lower beds of the has, there may be found a large supply of water, but the level of this is as a rule too low to rise to the surface through a boring. It will be necessary to sink shafts in the ordinary way to reach it. In the new red sandstone, also, to find the water, borings must be made to a considerable depth, but when this formation exists a copious supply may be confidently anticipated, and when found the water is of excellent quality.
Every permeable stratum may yield water, and its ability to do this, and the quantity it can yield, depend upon its position and extent. When underlaid by an impervious stratum, it constitutes a reservoir of water from which a supply may be drawn by means of a sinking or a bore-hole. If the permeable stratum be also overlaid by an impervious stratum, the water will be under pressure and will ascend the bore-hole to a height that will depend on the height of the points of infiltration above the bottom of the bore-hole. The quantity to be obtained in such a case as we have already pointed out, will depend upon the extent of surface possessed by the outcrop of the permeable stratum. In searching for water under such conditions a careful examination of the geological features of the district must be made. Frequently an extended view of the surface of the district, such as may be obtained from an eminence, and a consideration of the particular configuration of that surface, will be sufficient to enable the practical eye to discover the various routes which are followed by the subterranean water, and to predicate with some degree of certainty that at a given point water will be found in abundance, or that no water at all exists at that point. To do this, it is sufficient to note the dip and the surfaces of the strata which are exposed to the rains. When these strata are nearly horizontal, water can penetrate them only through their fissures or pores; when, on the contrary, they lie at right-angles, they absorb the larger portion of the water that falls upon their outcrop. When such strata are intercepted by valleys, numerous springs will exist. But if, instead of being intercepted, the strata rise around a common point, they form a kind of irregular basin, in the centre of which the water will accumulate. In this case the surface springs will be less numerous than when the strata are broken. But it is possible to obtain water under pressure in the lower portions of the basin, if the point at which the trial is made is situate below the outcrop.
The primary rocks afford generally but little water. Having been subjected to violent convulsions, they are thrown into every possible position and broken by numerous fissures; and as no permeable stratum is interposed, as in the more recent formations, no reservoir of water exists. In the unstratified rocks, the water circulates in all directions through the fissures that traverse them, and thus occupies no fixed level. It is also impossible to discover by a surface examination where the fissures may be struck by a boring. For purposes of water supply, therefore, these rocks are of little importance. It must be remarked here, however, that large quantities of water are frequently met with in the magnesian limestone and the lower red sand, which form the upper portion of the primary series.
Joseph Prestwich, jun., in his 'Geological Inquiry respecting the Water-bearing Strata round London,' gives the following valuable epitome of the geological conditions affecting the value of water-bearing deposits; and although the illustrations are confined to the Tertiary deposits, the same mode of inquiry will apply with but little modification to any other formation.
The main points are--
The extent of the superficial area occupied by the water-bearing deposit.
The lithological character and thickness of the water-bearing deposit, and the extent of its underground range.
The position of the outcrop of the deposit, whether in valleys or hills, and whether its outcrop is denuded, or covered with any description of drift.
The general elevation of the country occupied by this outcrop above the levels of the district in which it is proposed to sink wells.
The quantity of rain which falls in the district under consideration, and whether, in addition, it receives any portion of the drainage from adjoining tracts, when the strata are impermeable.
The disturbances which may affect the water-bearing strata, and break their continuous character, as by this the subterranean flow of water would be impeded or prevented.
EXTENT OF SUPERFICIAL AREA.
To proceed to the application of the questions in the particular instance of the lower tertiary strata. With regard to the first question, it is evident that a series of permeable strata encased between two impermeable formations can receive a supply of water at those points only where they crop out and are exposed on the surface of the land. The primary conditions affecting the result depend upon the fall of rain in the district where the outcrop takes place; the quantity of rain-water which any permeable strata can gather being in the same ratio as their respective areas. If the mean annual fall in any district amounts to 24 inches, then each square mile will receive a daily average of 950,947 gallons of rain-water. It is therefore a matter of essential importance to ascertain, with as much accuracy as possible, the extent of exposed surface of any water-bearing deposit, so as to determine the maximum quantity of rain-water it is capable of receiving.
The surface formed by the outcropping of any deposit in a country of hill and valley is necessarily extremely limited, and it would be difficult to measure in the ordinary way. Prestwich therefore used another method, which seems to give results sufficiently accurate for the purpose. It is a plan borrowed from geographers, that of cutting out from a map on paper of uniform thickness and on a large scale, say one inch to the mile, and weighing the superficial area of each deposit. Knowing the weight of a square of 100 miles cut out of the same paper, it is easy to estimate roughly the area in square miles of any other surface, whatever may be its figure.
MINERAL CHARACTER OF THE FORMATION.
The second question relates to the mineral character of the formation, and the effect it will have upon the quantity of water which it may hold or transmit.
If the strata consist of sand, water will pass through them with facility, and they will also hold a considerable quantity between the interstices of their component grains; whereas a bed of pure clay will not allow of the passage of water. These are the two extremes of the case; the intermixture of these materials in the same bed will of course, according to their relative proportions, modify the transmission of water. Prestwich found by experiment that a silicious sand of ordinary character will hold on an average rather more than one-third of its bulk of water, or from two to two and a half gallons in one cubic foot. In strata so composed the water may be termed free, as it passes easily in all directions, and under the pressure of a column of water is comparatively but little impeded by capillary attraction. These are the conditions of a true permeable stratum. Where the strata are more compact and solid, as in sandstone, limestone, and oolite, although all such rocks imbibe more or less water, yet the water so absorbed does not pass freely through the mass, but is held in the pores of the rock by capillary attraction, and parted with very slowly; so that in such deposits water can be freely transmitted only in the planes of bedding and in fissures. If the water-bearing deposit is of uniform lithological character over a large area, then the proposition is reduced to its simplest form; but when, as in the deposit between the London clay and the chalk, the strata consist of variable mineral ingredients, it becomes essential to estimate the extent of these variations; for very different conclusions might be drawn from an inspection of the Lower Tertiary strata at different localities.
[Illustration: _a_ London clay, _b_ Sands and clay, _c_ Chalk.
Fig. 5.]
In the fine section exposed in the cliffs between Herne Bay and the Reculvers, in England, a considerable mass of fossiliferous sands is seen to rise from beneath the London clay. Fig. 5 represents a view of a portion of this cliff a mile and a half east of Herne Bay and continued downwards, by estimation below the surface of the ground to the chalk. In this section there is evidently a very large proportion of sand, and consequently a large capacity for water. Again, at Upnor, near Rochester, the sands marked 3 are as much as 60 to 80 feet thick, and continue so to Gravesend, Purfleet, and Erith. In the first of these places they may be seen capping Windmill Hill; in the second, forming the hill, now removed, on which the lighthouse is built; and in the third, in the large ballast pits on the banks of the river Thames. The average thickness of these sands in this district may be about 50 to 60 feet. In their range from east to west, the beds 2 become more clayey and less permeable, and 1, very thin. As we approach London the thickness of 3 also diminishes. In the ballast pits at the west end of Woolwich, this sand-bed is not more than 35 feet thick, and as it passes under London becomes still thinner.
[Illustration: Fig. 6.
General Section of Strata below London.]
Fig. 6 is a general or average section of the strata on which London stands. The increase in the proportion of the argillaceous strata, and the decrease of the beds of sand, in the Lower Tertiary strata is here very apparent, and from this point westward to Hungerford, clays decidedly predominate; while at the same time the series presents such rapid variations, even on the same level and at short distances, that no two sections are alike. On the southern boundary of the Tertiary district, from Croydon to Leatherhead, the sands 3 maintain a thickness of 20 to 40 feet, whilst the associated beds of clay are of inferior importance. We will take another section, Fig. 7, representing the usual features of the deposit in the northern part of the Tertiary district. It is from a cutting at a brickfield west of the small village of Hedgerley, 6 miles northward of Windsor.
[Illustration: Unusual Deposit Features 6 miles North of Windsor.
Fig. 7.]
Here we see a large development of the mottled clays, and but little sand. A somewhat similar section is exhibited at Oak End, near Chalfont St. Giles. But to show how rapidly this series changes its character, the section of a pit only a third of a mile westward of the one at Hedgerley is given in Fig. 8.
[Illustration: Section of a Pit.
Fig. 8.]
In this latter section the mottled clays have nearly disappeared, and are replaced by beds of sand with thin seams of mottled clays. At Twyford, near Reading, and at Old Basing, near Basingstoke, the mottled clays again occupy, as at Hedgerley, nearly the whole space between the London clays and the chalk. Near Reading a good section of these beds was exhibited in the Sonning cutting of the Great Western Railway; they consisted chiefly of mottled clays. At the Katsgrove pits, Reading, the beds are more sandy. Referring back to Fig. 6, it may be noticed that there is generally a small quantity of water found in the bed marked 1, in parts of the neighbourhood of London. Owing, however, to the constant presence of green and ferruginous sands, traces of vegetable matters and remains of fossil shells, the water is usually indifferent and chalybeate. The well-diggers term this a slow spring. They well express the difference by saying that the water creeps up from this stratum, whereas that it bursts up from the lower sands 3, which is the great water-bearing stratum. In the irregular sand-beds interstratified with the mottled clays between these two strata water is also found, but not in any large quantity.
[Illustration: Section at Pebble Hill.
Fig. 9.]
Fig. 9 is a section at the western extremity of the Tertiary district at Pebble Hill, near Hungerford. Here again the mottled clays are in considerable force, sands forming the smaller part of the series.
The following lists exhibit the aggregate thickness of all the beds of sand occurring between the London clay and the chalk at various localities in the Tertiary district. It will appear from them that the mean results of the whole is very different from any of those obtained in separate divisions of the country. The mean thickness of the deposit throughout the whole Tertiary area may be taken at 62 feet, of which 36 feet consist of sands and 26 feet of clays; but as only a portion of this district contributes to the water supply of London, it will facilitate our inquiry if we divide it into two parts, the one westward of and including London, and the other eastward of it, introducing also some further subdivisions into each.
MEASUREMENT OF SECTIONS EASTWARD OF LONDON.
+---------------------+-----+-----+ |Southern Boundary. |Sand.|Clay.| +---------------------+-----+-----+ | | ft. | ft. | |Lewisham | 65 | 26 | |Woolwich | 66 | 18 | |Upnor | 80? | 8 | |Herne Bay | 70? | 50 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +-----+-----+ | Average | 70 | 25 | +---------------------+-----+-----+
+---------------------+-----+-----+ |Northern Boundary. |Sand.|Clay.| +---------------------+-----+-----+ | | ft.| ft. | |Hertford | 26 | 3 | |Beaumont Green, | | | | near Hoddesdon | 16 | 10 | |Broxbourne | 28 | 2 | |Gestingthorpe, | | | | near Sudbury | 50?| ? | |Whitton, | | | | near Ipswich | 60?| 5 | | +-----+-----+ | Average | 36 | 5 | +---------------------+-----+-----+
The mean of the three columns in two western sections gives a thickness to this formation of 57 feet, of which only 19 feet are sand and permeable to water, and the remaining 38 feet consist of impermeable clays, affording no supply of water.
The area, both at the surface and underground, over which they extend is about 1086 square miles.
MEASUREMENT OF SECTIONS WESTWARD OF LONDON.
+--------------------------------------------+ | On or near the Southern Boundary | | of the Tertiary District. | +--------------------------------+-----+-----+ | |Sand.|Clay.| | +-----+-----+ | | ft.| ft.| |Streatham | 30 | 25 | |Mitcham | 47 | 34 | |Croydon | 35?| 20?| |Epsom | 31 | 23 | |Fetcham | 35 | 20 | |Guildford | 10?| 40 | |Chinham, near Basingstoke | 20?| 30 | |Itchingswell, near Kingsclere | 22 | 34 | |Highclere | 24 | 27 | |Pebble Hill, near Hungerford | 9 | 39 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +-----+-----+ | Average | 26 | 29 | +--------------------------------+-----+-----+
+--------------------------------------------+ | On a Central Line in the | | Tertiary District. | +--------------------------------+-----+-----+ | |Sand.|Clay.| | +-----+-----+ | Sand.Clay.| ft.| ft.| | ft. ft. | | | |London: | | | | Millbank 49 40} | | | | Trafalgar Square 49 30} | | | | Tottenham Court Road 35 30} | | | | Pentonville 34 44} | 46 | 39 | | Barclay's Brewery 55 42} | | | | Lombard Street 53 35} | | | | The Mint 49 38} | | | | Whitechapel 45 50} | | | |Garrett, near Wandsworth | 20 | 52 | |Isleworth | 17 | 70 | |Twickenham | 7 | 50 | |Chobham | 3 | 45 | | +-----+-----+ | Average | 18 | 51 | +--------------------------------+-----+-----+
+--------------------------------------------+ | On or near the Northern Boundary | | of the Tertiary District | +--------------------------------+-----+-----+ | |Sand.|Clay.| | +-----+-----+ | | ft.| ft.| |Hatfield | 23 | 2 | |Watford | 25 | 10 | |Pinner | 12 | 32 | |Oak End, Chalfont St. Giles | 3 | 40 | |Hedgerley, near Slough | 5 | 45 | |Starveall, " " | 13 | 20 | |Twyford | 5 | 60 | |Sonning, near Reading | 12 | 54 | |Reading | 16 | 33 | |Newbury | 20 | 36 | |Pebble Hill | 9 | 39 | | | | | | | | | | +-----+-----+ | Average | 13 | 34 | +--------------------------------+-----+-----+
The average total thickness of the eastern district deduced from the nine sections we have taken gives 68 feet, of which 53 feet are sands and 15 feet clays. The larger area, 1849 square miles, over which the eastern portion of the Tertiary series extends, and the greater volume of the water-bearing beds, constitute important differences in favour of this district; and if there had been no geological disturbances to interfere with the continuous character of the strata, we might have looked to this quarter for a large supply of water to the Artesian wells of London.
[Illustration: A Geological Section.
Fig. 10.]
From these tables it will be readily perceived that the strata of which the water-bearing deposits are composed are very variable in their relative thickness. They consist, in fact, of alternating beds of clay and sand, in proportions constantly changing. In one place, as at Hedgerley, the aggregate beds of sand may be 5 feet thick, and the clays 45 feet; whilst at another, as at Leatherhead, the sands may be 35, and the clays 20 feet thick, and some such variation is observable in every locality. But although we may thus in some measure judge of the capacity of these beds for water, this method fails to show whether the communication from one part of the area to another is free, or impeded by causes connected with mineral character. Now as we know that these beds not only vary in their thickness, but that they also frequently thin out, and sometimes pass one into another, it may happen that a very large development of clay at any one place may altogether stop the transit of the water in that locality. Thus in Fig. 10 the beds of sand at y allow of the free passage of water, but at x, where clays occupy the whole thickness, it cannot pass; the obstruction which this cause may offer to the underground flow of water can only be determined by experience. It must not, however, be supposed that such a variation in the strata is permanent or general along any given line. It is always local, some of the beds of clay commonly thinning out after a certain horizontal range, so that, although the water may be impeded or retarded in a direct course, it most probably can, in part or altogether, pass round by some point where the strata have not undergone the same alteration.
POSITION AND GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE OUTCROP.
This involves some considerations to which an exact value cannot at present be given, yet which require notice, as they to a great extent determine the proportion of water which can pass from the surface into the mass of the water-bearing strata. In the first place, when the outcrop of these strata occurs in a valley, as represented in Fig. 11, it is evident that _b_ may not only retain all the water which might fall on its surface, but also would receive a proportion of that draining off from the strata of _a_ and _c_. This form of the surface generally prevails wherever the water-bearing strata are softer and less coherent than the strata above and below them.
[Illustration: Water-bearing Strata in a Valley.
Fig. 11.]
It may be observed in the Lower Tertiary series at Sutton, Carshalton, and Croydon, where a small and shallow valley, excavated in these sands and mottled clays, ranges parallel with the chalk hills.
It is apparent again between Epsom and Leatherhead, and also in some places between Guildford and Farnham, as well as between Odiham and Kingsclere. The Southampton Railway crosses this small valley on an embankment at Old Basing.
This may be considered as the prevailing, but not exclusive, form of structure from Croydon to near Hungerford. The advantage, however, to be gained from it in point of water supply is much limited by the rather high angle at which the strata are inclined, as well as by their small development, which greatly restrict the breadth of the surface occupied by the outcrop. It rarely exceeds a quarter of a mile, and is generally very much less, often not more than 100 to 200 feet. The next modification of outcrop, represented in Fig. 12, is one not uncommon on the south side of the Tertiary district. The strata _b_ here crop out on the slope of the chalk hills, and the rain falling upon them, unless rapidly absorbed, tends to drain at once from their surface into the adjacent valleys. V, L, shows the line of valley level.
[Illustration: Strata on Slope of Chalk Hills.
Fig. 12.]
This arrangement is not unfrequent between Kingsclere and Inkpen, and also between Guildford and Leatherhead. Eastward of London it is exhibited on a larger scale at the base of the chalk hills, in places between Chatham and Faversham, a line along which the sands of the Lower Tertiary strata, _b_, are more fully developed than elsewhere. As, however, the surface of _b_ is there usually more coincident with the valley level, V, L, of the district, it is in a better position for retaining more of the rainfall.
[Illustration: Chalk Stratum at Base of a Hill.
Fig. 13.]
A third position of outcrop, much more unfavourable for the water-bearing strata, prevails generally along the greater part of the northern boundary of the Tertiary strata. Instead of forming a valley, or outcropping at the base of the chalk hills, almost the whole length of this outcrop lies on the slope of the hills, as in Fig. 13, where the chalk _c_ forms the base of the hill and the lower ground at its foot, whilst the London clay, _a_, caps the summit, thus restricting the outcrop of _b_ to a very narrow zone and a sloping surface. This form of structure is exhibited in the hills round Sonning, Reading, Hedgerley, Rickmansworth, and Watford; thence by Shenley Hill, Hatfield, Hertford, Sudbury; and also at Hadleigh this position of outcrop is continued. If, as on the southern side of the Tertiary district, the outcrop were continued in a nearly unbroken line, then these unfavourable conditions would prevail uninterruptedly; but the hills are in broken groups, and intersected at short distances by transverse valleys, as that of the Kennet at Reading, of the Loddon at Twyford, of the Colne at Uxbridge, and so on. Between Watford and Hatfield there is a constant succession of small valleys running back for short distances from the Lower district of the chalk, through the hills of the Tertiary district. The Valley of the Lea at Roydon and Hoddesdon is a similar and stronger case in point. The effect of these transverse valleys is to open out a larger surface of the strata _b_ than would otherwise be exposed, for if the horizontal line, V, L, Fig. 13, were carried back beyond the point _x_, to meet the prolongation of _b_, then these Lower Tertiary strata would not only be intersected by the line of valley level, but would form a much smaller angle with the plane V, L, and therefore spread over a larger area than where they crop out on the side of the hills.
The foregoing are the three most general forms of outcrop, but occasionally the outcrop takes place wholly or partly on the summit of a hill, as, near the Reculvers in the neighbourhood of Canterbury, of Sittingbourne, and at the Addington Hills, near Croydon, in which cases the area of the Lower Tertiary is expanded. When the dip is very slight, and the beds nearly horizontal, the Lower Tertiary sands occasionally spread over a still larger extent of surface, as between Stoke Pogis, Burnham Common, and Beaconsfield, and in the case of the flat-topped hill, forming Blackheath and Bexley Heath, as in Fig. 14. Favourable as such districts might at first appear to be from the extent of their exposed surface, nevertheless they rarely contribute to the water supply of the wells sunk into the Lower Tertiary sands under London, the continuity of the strata being broken by intersecting valleys; thus the district last mentioned is bounded on the north by the valley of the Thames, on the west by that of Ravensbourne, and on the east by the valley of the Cray; consequently the rain-water, which has been absorbed by the very permeable strata on the intermediate higher ground, passes out on the sides of the hills, into the surface channels in the valleys, or into the chalk. Almost all the wells at Bexley Heath, for their supply of water, have, in fact, to be sunk into the chalk through the overlying 100 to 133 feet of sand and pebble beds, _b_.
[Illustration: Section at Blackheath and Bexley Heath.
Fig. 14.]
Thus far we have considered this question, as if, in each instance, the outcropping edges of the water-bearing strata, _b_, were laid bare, and presented no impediment to the absorption of the rain-water falling immediately upon their surface, or passing on to it from some more impermeable deposits. But there is another consideration which influences materially the extent of the water supply.
If the strata _b_ were always bare, we should have to consider their outcrop as an absorbent surface, of power varying according to the lithological character and dip of the strata only. But the outcropping edges of the strata do not commonly present bare and denuded surfaces. Thus a large extent of the country round London is more or less covered by beds of drift, which protect the outcropping beds of _b_, and turn off a portion of the water falling upon them.
The drift differs considerably in its power of interference with the passage of the rain-water into the strata beneath. The ochreous sandy flint gravel, forming so generally the subsoil of London, admits of the passage of water. All the shallow surface springs, from 10 to 20 feet deep, are produced by water which has fallen on, and passed through, this gravel, _g_, Fig. 15, down to the top of the London clay, _a_, on the irregular surface of which it is held up.
[Illustration: Section through London Subsoil.
Fig. 15.]
When the London clay is wanting, this gravel lies immediately upon the Lower Tertiary strata, as in the valley between Windsor and Maidenhead, and in that of the Kennet between Newbury and Thatcham, transmitting to the underlying strata part of the surface water. Where beds of brick earth occur in the drift, as between West Drayton and Uxbridge, the passage of the surface water into the underlying strata is intercepted.
Sometimes the drift is composed of gravel mixed very irregularly with broken up London clay, and although commonly not more than 3 to 8 feet thick, it is generally impermeable.
Over a considerable portion of Suffolk and part of Essex, a drift, composed of coarse and usually light-coloured sand with fine gravel, occurs. Water percolates through it with extreme facility, but it is generally covered by a thick mass of stiff tenacious bluish grey clay, perfectly impervious. This clay drift, or boulder clay, caps, to a depth of from 10 to 50 feet or more, almost all the hills in the northern division of Essex, and a large portion of Suffolk and Norfolk. It so conceals the underlying strata that it is difficult to trace the course of the outcrop of the Lower Tertiary sands between Ware and Ipswich; and often, as in Fig. 16, notwithstanding the breadth, apart from this cause of the outcrop of the Tertiary sands, _b_, and of the drift of sand and gravel, 2, they are both so covered by the boulder clay, 1, that the small surface exposed can be of comparatively little value.
[Illustration: Outcrop covered by Boulder Clay.
Fig. 16.]
There are also, in some valleys, river deposits of silt, mud, and gravel. These are, however, of little importance to the subject before us. Under ordinary conditions they are generally sufficiently impervious to prevent the water from passing through the beds beneath.
HEIGHT OF WATER-BEARING STRATA ABOVE SURFACE OF COUNTRY.
The height of the districts, wherein the water-bearing strata crop out, above that of the surface of the country in which the wells are placed, should be made the subject of careful consideration, as upon this point depends the level to which the water in Artesian wells may ascend.
Again, taking the London district as an example, Prestwich remarks that, as the country rises on both sides of the Thames to the edge of the chalk escarpments, and as the outcrop of the Lower Tertiary strata is intermediate between these escarpments and the Thames, it follows that the outcrop of these lower beds must, in all cases, be on a higher level than the Thames itself, where it flows through the centre of the Tertiary district. Its altitude is, of course, very variable, as shown in the following list of its approximate height above Trinity high water-mark at London. These heights are taken where the Tertiaries are at their lowest level in the several localities mentioned.
--------------------------------+------------------------- South of London. | North of London. --------------------------------+------------------------- Croydon about 130 feet. | Thetford about 200 feet. Leatherhead " 90 " | Watford " 170 " Guildford " 96 " | Slough " 60 " Old Basing " 250 " | Reading " 120 " Near Hungerford " 360 " | Newbury " 236 " --------------------------------+-------------------------
Eastward of London these strata crop out at a gradually decreasing level. In consequence, therefore, of the outcrop of the water-bearing strata being thus much above the surface of the central Tertiary district bordering the Thames, the water in these strata beneath London tended originally to rise above that surface.
As, however, these beds crop out on a level with the Thames immediately east of the city between Deptford, Blackwall, and Bow, the water, having this natural issue so near, could never have risen in London much above the level of the river.
RAINFALL IN THE DISTRICT WHERE THE WATER-BEARING STRATA CROP OUT.
When inquiring into the probable relative value of any water-bearing strata, it is necessary to compare the rainfall in their respective districts.
Rain is of all meteorological phenomena the most capricious, both as regards its frequency and the amount which falls in a given time. In some places it rarely or never falls, whilst in others it rains almost every day; and there does not yet exist any theory from which a probable estimate of the rainfall in a given district can be deduced independently of direct observation. But although dealing with one of the most capricious of the elements, we nevertheless find a workable average in the quantity of rain to be expected in any particular place, if careful and continued observations are made with the rain-gauge. G. J. Symons, the meteorologist, to whose continued investigations we are indebted for our most reliable data upon the subject of rainfall, gives the following practical instructions for using a rain-gauge;--
"The mouth of the gauge must be set quite level, and so fixed that it will remain so; it should never be less than 6 inches above the ground, nor more than 1 foot except when a greater elevation is absolutely necessary to obtain a proper exposure.
"It must be set on a level piece of ground, at a distance from shrubs, trees, walls, and buildings, at the very least as many feet from their base as they are in height.
"If a thoroughly clear site cannot be obtained, shelter is most endurable from N.W., N., and E., less so from S., S.E., and W., and not at all from S.W. or N.E.
"Special prohibition must issue as to keeping all tall-growing flowers away from the gauges.
"In order to prevent rust, it will be desirable to give the japanned gauges a coat of paint every two or three years.
"The gauge should, if possible, be emptied daily at 9 A.M., and the amount entered against the previous day.
"When making an observation, care should be taken to hold the glass upright.
"It can hardly be necessary to give here a treatise on decimal arithmetic; suffice it therefore to say that rain-gauge glasses usually hold half an inch of rain (0·50) and that each 1/100 (0·01) is marked; if the fall is less than half an inch, the number of hundredths is read off at once, if it is over half an inch, the glass must be filled up to the half inch (0·50), and the remainder (say 0·22) measured afterwards, the total (0·50 + 0·22) = 0·72 being entered. If less than 1/10 (0·10) has fallen, the cipher must always be prefixed; thus if the measure is full up to the seventh line, it must be entered as 0·07, that is, no inches, no tenths, and seven hundredths. For the sake of clearness it has been found necessary to lay down an invariable rule that there shall always be two figures to the right of the decimal point. If there be only one figure, as in the case of one-tenth of an inch, usually written 0·1, a cipher must be added, making it 0·10. Neglect of this rule causes much inconvenience.
"In snow three methods may be adopted--it is well to try them all. 1. Melt what is caught in the funnel, and measure that as rain. 2. Select a place where the snow has not drifted, invert the funnel, and turning it round, lift and melt what is enclosed. 3. Measure with a rule the average depth of snow, and take one-twelfth as the equivalent of water. Some observers use in snowy weather a cylinder of the same diameter as the rain-gauge, and of considerable depth. If the wind is at all rough, all the snow is blown out of a flat-funnelled rain-gauge."
A drainage area is almost always a district of country enclosed by a ridge or watershed line, continuous except at the place where the waters of the basin find an outlet. It may be, and generally is, divided by branch ridge-lines into a number of smaller basins, each drained by its own stream into the main stream. In order to measure the area of a catchment basin a plan of the country is required, which either shows the ridge-lines or gives data for finding their positions by means of detached levels, or of contour lines.
When a catchment basin is very extensive it is advisable to measure the smaller basins of which it consists, as the depths of rainfall in them may be different; and sometimes, also, for the same reason, to divide those basins into portions at different distances from the mountain chains, where rain-clouds are chiefly formed.
The exceptional cases, in which the boundary of a drainage area is not a ridge-line on the surface of the country, are those in which the rain-water sinks into a porous stratum until its descent is stopped by an impervious stratum, and in which, consequently, one boundary at least of the drainage area depends on the figure of the impervious stratum, being, in fact, a ridge-line on the upper surface of that stratum, instead of on the ground, and very often marking the upper edge of the outcrop of that stratum. If the porous stratum is partly covered by a second impervious stratum, the nearest ridge-line on the latter stratum to the point where the porous stratum crops out will be another boundary of the drainage area. In order to determine a drainage area under these circumstances it is necessary to have a geological map and sections of the district.
The depth of rainfall in a given time varies to a great extent at different seasons, in different years, and in different places. The extreme limits of annual depth of rainfall in different parts of the world may be held to be respectively nothing and 150 inches. The average annual depth of rainfall in different parts of Britain ranges from 22 inches to 140 inches, and the least annual depth recorded in Britain is about 15 inches.
The rainfall in different parts of a given country is, in general, greatest in those districts which lie towards the quarter from which the prevailing winds blow; in Great Britain, for instance, the western districts have the most rain. Upon a given mountain ridge, however, the reverse is the case, the greatest rainfall taking place on that side which lies to leeward, as regards the prevailing winds. To the same cause may be ascribed the fact that the rainfall is greater in mountainous than in flat districts, and greater at points near high mountain summits than at points farther from them; and the difference due to elevation is often greater by far than that due to 100 miles geographical distance.
The most important data respecting the depth of rainfall in a given district, for practical purposes, are, the least annual rainfall; mean annual rainfall; greatest annual rainfall; distribution of the rainfall at different seasons, and especially, the longest continuous drought; greatest flood rainfall, or continuous fall of rain in a short period.
The available rainfall of a district is that part of the total rainfall which remains to be stored in reservoirs, or carried away by streams, after deducting the loss through evaporation, through permanent absorption by plants and by the ground, and other causes.
The proportion borne by the available to the total rainfall varies very much, being affected by the rapidity of the rainfall and the compactness or porosity of the soil, the steepness or flatness of the ground, the nature and quantity of the vegetation upon it, the temperature and moisture of the air, which will affect the rate of evaporation, the existence of artificial drains, and other circumstances. The following are examples:
Available Rainfall. Ground. ÷ Total Rainfall.
Steep surfaces of granite, gneiss, and slate, nearly 1 Moorland and hilly pasture from ·8 to ·6 Flat cultivated country from ·5 to ·4 Chalk 0
Deep-seated springs and wells give from ·3 to ·4 of the total rainfall. Stephenson found that for the chalk district round Watford the evaporation was about 34 per cent., the quantity carried off by streams 23·2 per cent., leaving 42·8 per cent., which sank below the surface to form springs. In formations less absorbent than the chalk it can be calculated roughly, that streams carry off one-third, that another third evaporates, and that the remaining third of the total rainfall sinks into the earth.
Such data as the above may be used in approximately estimating the probable available rainfall of a district; but a much more accurate and satisfactory method is to measure the actual discharge of the streams, and the quantity lost by evaporation, at the same time that the rain-gauge observations are made, and so to find the actual proportion of available to total rainfall.
The following Table gives the mean annual rainfall in various parts of the world;--
TABLE OF RAINFALL. Collected by G. J. Symons.
-----------------------------+--------------+----------+------- | Period | | Mean Country and Station. | of | Latitude.| Annual | Observations.| | Fall. -----------------------------+--------------+----------+------- EUROPE. | years | ° ´ | ins. AUSTRIA--Cracow | 5 | 50 4N | 33·1 Prague | 47 | 50 5 | 15·1 Vienna | 10 | 48 12 | 19·6 BELGIUM--Brussels | 20 | 50 51 | 28·6 Ghent | 13 | 51 4 | 30·6 Louvain | 12 | 50 33 | 28·6 DENMARK--Copenhagen | 12 | 55 41 | 22·3 FRANCE--Bayonne | 10 | 43 29 | 56·2 Bordeaux | 32 | 44 50 | 32·4 Brest | 30 | 48 23 | 38·8 Dijon | 20 | 47 14 | 31·1 FRANCE--Lyons | .. | 45 46 | 37·0 Marseilles | 60 | 43 17 | 19·0 Montpelier | 51 | 43 36 | 30·3 Nice | 20 | 43 43 | 55·2 Paris | 44 | 48 50 | 22·9 Pau | 12 | 43 19 | 37·1 Rouen | 10 | 49 27 | 33·7 Toulon | .. | 43 4 | 19·7 Toulouse | 52 | 43 36 | 24·9 GREAT BRITAIN-- | | | England, London | 40 | 51 31 | 24·0 " Manchester | 40 | 53 29 | 36·0 " Exeter | 40 | 50 44 | 33·0 " Lincoln | 40 | 53 15 | 20·0 Wales, Cardiff | 40 | 51 28 | 43·0 " Llandudno | 40 | 53 19 | 30·0 Scotland, Edinburgh | 40 | 55 57 | 24·0 " Glasgow | 40 | 55 52 | 39·0 " Aberdeen | 40 | 57 8 | 31·0 Ireland, Cork | 40 | 51 54 | 40·0 " Dublin | 40 | 53 23 | 30·0 " Galway | 40 | 53 15 | 50·0 HOLLAND--Rotterdam | .. | 51 55 | 22·0 ICELAND--Reikiavik | 5 | 64 8 | 28·0 IONIAN ISLES--Corfu | 22 | 39 37 | 42·4 ITALY--Florence | 8 | 43 46 | 35·9 Milan | 68 | 45 29 | 38·0 Naples | 8 | 40 52 | 39·3 Rome | 40 | 41 53 | 30·9 Turin | 4 | 45 5 | 38·6 Venice | 19 | 45 25 | 34·1 MALTA | .. | 35 54 | 15·0 NORWAY--Bergen | 10 | 60 24 | 84·8 Christiania | .. | 59 54 | 26·7 PORTUGAL--Coimbra | | | (in Vale of Mondego) | 2 | 40 13 | 224·0? Lisbon | 20 | 38 42 | 23·0 PRUSSIA--Berlin | 6 | 52 30 | 23·6 Cologne | 10 | 50 55 | 24·0 Hanover | 3 | 52 24 | 22·4 Potsdam | 10 | 52 24 | 20·3 RUSSIA--St. Petersburg | 14 | 59 56 | 16·2 Archangel | 1 | 64 32 | 14·5 Astrakhan | 4 | 46 24 | 6·1 Finland, Uleaborg | .. | 65 0 | 13·5 SICILY--Palermo | 24 | 38 8 | 22·8 SPAIN--Madrid | .. | 40 24 | 9·0 Oviedo | 1 | 43 22 | 111·1 SWEDEN--Stockholm | 8 | 59 20 | 19·7 SWITZERLAND--Geneva | 72 | 46 12 | 31·8 Great St. Bernard | 43 | 45 50 | 58·5 Lausanne | 8 | 46 30 | 38·5 | | | ASIA. | | | CHINA--Canton | 14 | 23 6 | 69·3 Macao | .. | 22 24 | 68·3 Pekin | 7 | 39 54 | 26·9 INDIA-- | | | Ceylon, Colombo | .. | 6 56 | 91·7 " Kandy | .. | 7 18 | 84·0 " Adam's Peak | .. | 6 50 | 100·0 Bombay | 33 | 18 56 | 84·7 Calcutta | 20 | 22 35 | 66·9 Cherrapongee | .. | 25 16 | 610·3? Darjeeling | .. | 27 3 | 127·3 Madras | 22 | 13 4 | 44·6 Mahabuleshwur | 15 | 17 56 | 254·0 Malabar, Tellicherry | .. | 11 44 | 116·0 Palamcotta | 5 | 8 30 | 21·1 Patna | .. | 25 40 | 36·7 Poonah | 4 | 18 30 | 23·4 MALAY--Pulo Penang | .. | 5 25 | 100·5 Singapore | .. | 1 17 | 190·0 PERSIA--Lencoran | 3 | 38 44 | 42·8 Ooroomiah | 1 | 37 28 | 21·5 RUSSIA--Barnaoul | 15 | 53 20 | 11·8 Nertchinsk | 12 | 51 18 | 17·5 Okhotsk | 2 | 59 13 | 35·2 Tiflis | 6 | 41 42 | 19·3 Tobolsk | 2 | 58 12 | 23·0 TURKEY--Palestine, Jerusalem | { 14 | 31 47 | 65·0? | { 3 | 31 47 | 16·3 Smyrna | .. | 38 26 | 27·6 | | | AFRICA. | | | ABYSSINIA--Gondar | .. | 12 36 | 37·3 ALGERIA--Algiers | 10 | 36 47 | 37·0 Constantina | .. | 36 24 | 30·8 Mostaganem | 1 | 35 50 | 22·0 Oran | 2 | 35 50 | 22·1 ASCENSION | 2 | 8 8S | 11·5 CAPE COLONY--Cape Town | 20 | 33 52 | 24·3 GUINEA--Christiansborg | .. | 5 30N | 19·2 MADEIRA | 4 | 33 30 | 30·9 MAURITIUS--Port Louis | .. | 20 3S | 35·2 NATAL--Maritzburgh | .. | 29 36 | 27·6 ST. HELENA | 3 | 15 55N | 18·8 SIERRA LEONE | .. | 8 30 | 86·0 TENERIFFE | 2 | 28 28 | 22·3 | | | NORTH AMERICA. | | | BRITISH COLUMBIA-- | | | New Westminster | 3 | 49 12 | 54·1 CANADA--Montreal, | | | St. Martin's | 2 | 45 31 | 47·3 Toronto | 16 | 43 39 | 31·4 HONDURAS--Belize | 1 | 17 29 | 153·0 MEXICO--Vera Cruz | .. | 19 12 | 66·1 RUSSIAN AMERICA--Sitka | 7 | 57 3 | 89·9 UNITED STATES--Arkansas, | | | Fort Smith | 15 | 35 23 | 42·1 California, San Francisco | 9 | 37 48 | 23·4 Nebraska, Fort Kearny | 6 | 40 38 | 28·8 New Mexico, Socorro | 2 | 34 10 | 7·9 New York, West Point | 12 | 41 23 | 46·5 Ohio, Cincinnati | 20 | 39 6 | 46·9 Pennsylvania, Philadelphia | 19 | 39 57 | 43·6 South Carolina, Charlestown| 15 | 32 46 | 48·3 Texas, Matamoras | 6 | 25 54 | 35·2 WEST INDIES--Antigua | .. | 17 3 | 39·5 Barbadoes | 10 | 13 12 | 75·0 " St. Philip | 20 | 13 13 | 56·1 Cuba, Havannah | 2 | 23 9 | 50·2 Matanzas | 1 | 23 2 | 55·3 Grenada | .. | 12 8 | 126·0 Guadaloupe, Basseterre | .. | 16 5 | 126·9 " Matonba | .. | 16 5 | 285·8 Jamaica, Caraib | .. | 18 3 | 97·0 " Kingstown | .. | 17 58 | 83·0 St. Domingo, Cape Haitien | .. | 19 43 | 127·9 " Tivoli | .. | 19 0 | 106·7 Trinidad | .. | 10 40 | 62·9 Virgin Isles, St. Thomas' | .. | 18 17 | 60·6 " Tortola | .. | 18 27 | 65·1 | | | SOUTH AMERICA. | | | BRAZIL--Rio Janeiro | .. | 22 54S | 58·7 S. Luis de Maranhao | .. | 3 0 | 276·0 GUYANA--Cayenne | 6 | 4 56 | 138·3 Demerara, George Town | 5 | 6 50 | 87·9 Paramaribo | .. | 6 0 | 229·2 NEW GRANADA--La Baja | 6 | 7 22 | 54·1 Marmato | 15 | 5 29 | 90·0 Santa Fé de Bogota | 6 | 4 36 | 43·8 VENEZUELA--Cumana | .. | 10 27 | 7·5 Curaçoa | .. | 12 15N | 26·6 | | | AUSTRALIA. | | | NEW SOUTH WALES--Bathurst | 3 | 33 24S | 22·7 Deniliquin | 2 | 35 32 | 13·8 Newcastle | 3 | 32 57 | 55·3 Port Macquarie | 12 | 31 29 | 70·8 Sydney | 6 | 33 52 | 46·2 NEW ZEALAND--Auckland | 2 | 36 50 | 31·2 Christchurch | 3 | 43 45 | 31·7 Nelson | 2 | 41 18 | 38·4 Taranaki | 2 | 39 3 | 52·7 Wellington | 2 | 41 17 | 37·8 SOUTH AUSTRALIA--Adelaide | 6 | 34 55 | 19·2 TASMANIA--Hobart Town | 12 | 42 54 | 20·3 VICTORIA--Melbourne | 6 | 37 49 | 30·9 Port Phillip | 11 | 38 30 | 29·2 WEST AUSTRALIA--Albany | .. | 35 0 | 32·1 York | 1 | 31 55 | 25·4 | | | POLYNESIA. | | | SOCIETY ISLANDS-- | | | Tahiti, Papiete | 5 | 17 32 | 45·7 -----------------------------+--------------+----------+--------
DISTURBANCES OF THE STRATA.
The last question to be considered relates to the disturbances which may have affected the strata; for whatever may be the absorbent power of the strata, the yield of water will be more or less diminished whenever the channels of communication have suffered break or fracture.
If the strata remained continuous and unbroken, we should merely have to ascertain the dimensions and lithological character of the strata in order to determine their water value. But if the strata is broken, the interference with the subterranean transmission of water will be proportionate to the extent of the disturbance.
Although the Tertiary formations around London have probably suffered less from the action of disturbing forces than the strata of any other district of the same extent in England, yet they nevertheless now exhibit considerable alterations from their original position.
The principal change has been that which, by elevation of the sides or depression of the centre of the district, gave the Tertiary deposits their present trough-shaped form, assuming it not to be the result of original deposition. If no further change had taken place we might have expected to find an uninterrupted communication in the Lower Tertiary strata from their northern outcrop at Hertford to their southern outcrop at Croydon, as well as from Newbury on the west to the sea on the east; and the entire length of 260 miles of outcrop would have contributed to the general supply of water at the centre.
But this is far from being the case; several disturbing causes have deranged the regularity of original structure. The principal one has caused a low axis of elevation, or rather a line of flexure running east and west, following nearly the course of the Thames from the Nore to Deptford, and apparently continued thence beyond Windsor. It brings up the chalk at Cliff, Purfleet, Woolwich, and Loampit Hill to varied but moderate elevations above the river level. Between Lewisham and Deptford the chalk disappears below the Tertiary series, and does not come to the surface till we reach the neighbourhood of Windsor and Maidenhead.
There is also, probably, another line of disturbance running between some points north and south and intersecting the first line at Deptford. It passes apparently near Beckenham and Lewisham, and then, crossing the Thames near Deptford, continues up a part, if not along the whole length of the valley of the Lea towards Hoddesdon. This disturbance appears in some places to have resulted in a fracture or a fault in the strata, placing the beds on the east of it on a higher level than those on the west; and at other places merely to have produced a curvature in the strata. Prestwich states that he was unable to give its exact course, but its effect, at all events upon the water supply of London, is important, as, in conjunction with the first or Thames valley disturbance, it cuts off the supplies from the whole of Kent, and interferes most materially with the supply from Essex; for in its course up the valley of the Lea it either brings up the Lower Tertiary strata to the surface, as at Stratford and Bow, or else, as farther up the valley, it raises them to within 40 or 60 feet of the surface.
The Tertiary district thus appears, on a general view, to be divided naturally into four portions by lines running nearly north and south, the former line passing immediately south, and the latter east of London, which stands at the south-east corner of the north-western division, and consequently it must not be viewed as the centre of one large and unbroken area, so far as the Tertiary strata are concerned.