part II

. c. 4. s. 4.) that "The greater part of the works on the harmony of the gospels are quite useless for our times, as their authors mostly proceed on incorrect principles." He refers only to the chief of them, namely:

Osiander, 1537. | Macknight, 1756. Jansen, 1549-72. | Bengel, 1766. Chemnitz, 1593. | Büsching, 1766. Lightfoot, 1644. | Bertlings, 1767. Van Til, 1687. | Priestley, 1777. Lamy, 1689. | Schutte, 1779. Le Roux, 1699. | Stephan, 1779. Le Clerc, 1700. | Michaelis in his New Test. May, 1707. | Rullmann, 1790. Von Canstein, 1718-27.| Griesbach, 1776-97. Rus, 1727-30. | White, 1799. Hauber. | De Wette, 1818.

For other Harmonies, see Mr. Horne's _Bibliog. Index_, p. 128. Heringa considers that the following writers "have brought the four Evangelists into an harmonious arrangement, namely:

Hesz, 1784. | Stronck, 1800. Bergen 1804.| Townsend, 1834.

And especially as to the sufferings and resurrection of Christ:

Voss, 1701. | Michaelis (translated by Duckett, 1827). Iken, 1743. | Cremer, 1795.

T. J. BUCKTON.

Birmingham.

{416} Ammonius, an Egyptian Christian nearly cotemporary with Origen (third century), wrote a Harmony of the four gospels, which is supposed to be one of those still extant in the _Biblioth. Max. Patrum_. But whether the larger Harmony in tom. ii.