Chapter IV.
Footnote 814:
_Ibid._ Chapter IV, p. 81.
Footnote 815:
See Calmette, “Rapport sur les vaccinations contre la peste,” _Compt. rend. d. X Congr. internat. d’hyg. de Paris_, 1900.
Footnote 816:
_Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1897, SS. 227, 289.
Footnote 817:
_Ann. de l’Inst. Pasteur_, Paris, 1899. t. XIII, p. 902.
Footnote 818:
_Bull. Acad. roy. de méd. de Belg._, Bruxelles, 1900. 27 Octobre.
Footnote 819:
_Bull. Acad. de méd._, Paris, 1895, t. XXXIV, p. 407; _ibid._, 1897, t. XXXVIII, p. 109; _Compt. rend. XII Congr. Internat. de Méd. à Moscou_, 1897, t. VII, p. 244.
Footnote 820:
_Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1893, S. 390.
Footnote 821:
Ehrlich, Kossel u. Wassermann, _Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1894, S. 353; _Klin. Jahrb._, Berlin, 1897, Bd. VI.
Footnote 822:
_Compt. rend. X Congr. internat. d’hyg. et de démogr._, Paris, 1900.
Footnote 823:
_Ztschr. d. Hyg._, Leipzig, 1901, Bd. XXXVIII, S. 372.
Footnote 824:
_Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1895, S. 408.
Footnote 825:
_Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1895, SS. 426, 443, 464.
Footnote 826:
_Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1895, S. 758.
Footnote 827:
_Berl. klin. Wchnschr._, 1896, S. 602.
Footnote 828:
_Berl. klin. Wchnschr._, 1896, S. 516.
Footnote 829:
_Therap. Monatsh._, Berlin, 1896, S. 269.
Footnote 830:
_Deutsche Vrtljschr. f. öff. Gsndhtspflg._, Brnschwg., 1897, Bd. XXIX, Heft 1.
Footnote 831:
See the report by Löhr in _Jahrb. f. Kinderh._, Leipzig, 1896, Bd. XLIII, S. 67.
Footnote 832:
See Slawyk, _Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1898, S. 35.
Footnote 833:
“Les progrès dans l’application du sérum antidiphthérique,” St Pétersbourg, 1898, p. 105 (in Russian).
Footnote 834:
_Vrach_, St Pétersbourg, 1900, p. 1178 (in Russian).
Footnote 835:
_Chron. méd. d. gouvern. de Kherson_, 1896, No. 5, p. 160 (in Russian).
Footnote 836:
_Chron. méd. d. gouvern. de Kherson_, 1896, No. 19, p. 743.
Footnote 837:
_Bull. et mém. Soc. méd. des Hôp. de Paris_, 1901, p. 585.
Footnote 838:
_Bull. Soc. d. Pédiatr. de Paris_, 1901, mai et juin.
Footnote 839:
_Compt. rend. Acad. d. sc._, Paris, 1896, t. CXXII, p. 441.
Footnote 840:
_Compt. rend. Acad. d. sc._, Paris, 1885, t. C, p. 659.
Footnote 841:
This pamphlet has been reprinted in the _Rec. de méd. vét._, Paris, 1886, p. 624.
Footnote 842:
Barthels, “Die Medicin der Naturvölker,” Leipzig, 1893, S. 128; Pagel, “Einführung in die Geschichte der Medicin,” Berlin, 1898, S. 313.
Footnote 843:
Häser, “Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Medicin,” 3^{te} Aufl., Jena, 1881, Bd. II S. 1075.
Footnote 844:
See Vallery-Radot, “La Vie de Pasteur,” Paris, 1900, p. 427.
Footnote 845:
_Compt. rend. Acad. d. sc._, Paris, 1880, t. XC, pp. 939, 952, 1030; t. XCI, pp. 571, 673.
Footnote 846:
_Compt. rend. Acad. d. sc._, Paris, 1880, t. XC, p. 247.
Footnote 847:
_Compt. rend. Acad. d. sc._, Paris, 1880, t. XC, p. 1526.
Footnote 848:
_Compt. rend. Acad. d. sc._, Paris, 1880, t. XCI, p. 536.
Footnote 849:
_Compt. rend. Acad. d. sc._, Paris, 1880, t. XCI, p. 680.
Footnote 850:
“Die Naegeli’sche Theorie d. Infectionskrankheiten,” Leipzig, 1877; “Eine neue Theorie über Erziel. v. Immunität,” München, 1883.
Footnote 851:
_Virchow’s Archiv_, 1881, Bd. LXXXIV, S. 87.
Footnote 852:
_Mitth. a. d. k. Gsndhtsamte_, Berlin, 1881, Bd. I, S. 134.
Footnote 853:
_Compt. rend. Soc. de biol._, Paris, 1870, p. 115; _Gaz. hebd. de méd._, Paris, 1871, p. 291.
Footnote 854:
Abstract in _Schmidt’s Jahrb._, Leipzig, 1872, Bd. CLX, S. 97.
Footnote 855:
“Beiträge zur pathologische Anatomie der Schusswunden,” Leipzig, 1872.
Footnote 856:
_Archiv f. Gynaek._, Berlin, 1872, Bd. III, S. 293.
Footnote 857:
Cohn’s _Beitr. z. Biol. d. Pflanzen_, Breslau, 1876, Bd. II, S. 300.
Footnote 858:
_Virchow’s Archiv_, 1874, Bd. LX, S. 347.
Footnote 859:
_Virchow’s Archiv_, 1877, Bd. lxx, S. 546; 1881, Bd. LXXXIV, S. 87.
Footnote 860:
_Archiv f. Physiol._, Leipzig, 1881, S. 308, Taf. V.
Footnote 861:
“Beiträge zur Biologie niederster Organismen,” Marburg, 1881.
Footnote 862:
Roser, “Ueber Entzündung und Heilung,” Leipzig, 1886.
Footnote 863:
“Methoden der Bacterienforschung,” 4^{te} Aufl., Wiesbaden, 1889, S. 10.
Footnote 864:
“Die Radiolarien,” Berlin, 1862.
Footnote 865:
“Die Kalkschwämme,” Berlin, 1872.
Footnote 866:
_Arb. a. d. zool. Inst. d. Univ. Wien_, 1883, Bd. V, S. 141.
Footnote 867:
_Biol. Centralbl._, Erlangen, 1883, Bd. III, S. 560.
Footnote 868:
_Virchow’s Archiv_, 1884, Bd. XCVI, S. 177.
Footnote 869:
_Virchow’s Archiv_, 1884, Bd. XCVII, S. 502.
Footnote 870:
_Rep. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci._, London, 1896, p. 26; _Rev. Scient._, Paris, 17 Octobre, 1896, p. 493.
Footnote 871:
_Berl. klin. Wchnschr._, 1884.
Footnote 872:
_Ztschr. f. klin. Med._, Berlin, 1888, Bd. XV, S. 1.
Footnote 873:
_Virchow’s Archiv_, 1888, Bd. CXIV, S. 465; _Ann. de l’Inst. Pasteur_, Paris, 1890, t. IV, p. 35.
Footnote 874:
“Lehrb. d. pathol. Anat.,” Jena, 3^{te} Aufl.; _Beitr. z. path. Anat._, Jena, 1889, Bd. V, S. 419.
Footnote 875:
_Fortschr. d. Med._, Berlin, 1887, Bd. V, S. 732; _Ibid._, 1888, Bd. VI, SS. 83, 809.
Footnote 876:
_Virchow’s Archiv_, 1885, Bd. CI, S. 12.
Footnote 877:
_Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1890, S. 690.
Footnote 878:
_Virchow’s Archiv_, 1887, Bd. CIX, S. 365.
Footnote 879:
_Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1886, S. 617; _Arch. f. Hyg._, München u. Leipzig, 1886, Bd. IV, S. 129.
Footnote 880:
_Ztschr. f. Hyg._, Leipzig, 1888, Bd. IV, S. 353.
Footnote 881:
_Ztschr. f. Hyg._, Leipzig, 1888, Bd. IV, S. 223.
Footnote 882:
_Ztschr. f. Hyg._, Leipzig, 1888, Bd. IV, S. 318.
Footnote 883:
_Centralbl. f. klin. Med._, Bonn, 1888, No. 38.
Footnote 884:
_Ztschr. f. Hyg._, Leipzig, 1890, Bd. VIII, S. 412.
Footnote 885:
_Fortschr. d. Med._, Berlin, 1887, Bd. V, S. 653.
Footnote 886:
_München. med. Wchnschr._, 1887.
Footnote 887:
_Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk._, Jena, 1891, Bd. X, S. 727.
Footnote 888:
_Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk._, Jena, 1890, Bd. VIII, S. 65.
Footnote 889:
“Les microbes pathogènes,” Paris, 1892.
Footnote 890:
_Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk._, Jena, 1889, Bd. VI, SS. 481, 529.
Footnote 891:
“Ueber bacteriologische Forschung,” Berlin, 1890.
Footnote 892:
“The present position of antiseptic surgery,” Berlin, 1890.
Footnote 893:
_München. med. Wchnschr._, 1891, SS. 551, 574.
Footnote 894:
_Ann. de l’Inst. Pasteur_, Paris, 1891, t. V, p. 517.
Footnote 895:
_Ann. de l’Inst. Pasteur_, Paris, 1887, t. I, p. 561.
Footnote 896:
_Ann. de l’Inst. Pasteur_, Paris, 1891, t. V, pp. 465, 534.
Footnote 897:
_Ann. de l’Inst. Pasteur_, Paris, 1892, t. VI, p. 289.
Footnote 898:
_Compt. rend. Acad. d. sc._, Paris, 1888, t. CVII, pp. 690, 748.
Footnote 899:
_Ztschr. f. Hyg._, Leipzig, 1894, Bd. XVI, S. 268.
Footnote 900:
_Ztschr. f. Hyg._, Leipzig, 1894, Bd. XVIII, S. 1; cf. also Pfeiffer u. Issaeff, _ibid._, 1894, Bd. XVII, S. 355.
Footnote 901:
_Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Berlin, 1896, SS. 97, 119.
Footnote 902:
“Schutzimpfung und Impfschutz,” Marburg, 1895.
Footnote 903:
_Ann. de l’Inst. Pasteur_, Paris, 1895, t. IX, p. 433.
Footnote 904:
_Ann. de l’Inst. Pasteur_, Paris, 1895, t. IX, p. 462; 1896, t. X, pp. 104, 193.
Footnote 905:
_Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk._, Jena, 1896, I^{te} Abt., Bd. XX, S. 766.
Footnote 906:
It would clearly be wrong to take one’s stand, in a purely scientific question, on a national point of view. But it is a still greater mistake to look at matters, in the investigation of problems which concern science only, from a personal point of view. This, however, is what has happened several times in the discussion of phagocytosis. Certain discontented students have attempted to avenge themselves by publishing works and criticisms directed against the theory of phagocytosis. Having no doubt as to the motive for these publications I consider myself fully justified in not referring to them in this book, in which I have taken an exclusively scientific point of view, and in which I have endeavoured to weigh as carefully as possible all criticisms and objections that have been directed against me.
Footnote 907:
_Ztschr. f. Hyg._, Leipzig, 1898, Bd. XXVII, S. 272.
Footnote 908:
_Ann. de l’Inst. Pasteur_, Paris, 1898, t. XII, p. 688; 1899, t. XIII, p. 273.
Footnote 909:
_Berl. klin. Wchnschr._, 1899, S. 6.
Footnote 910:
_Brit. Med. Journ._, London, 1892, Vol. I, pp. 373, 492, 591, 604. A very short summary of this discussion was given in the _Deutsche med. Wchnschr._, Leipzig, 1892, S. 296.
Footnote 911:
_München. med. Wchnschr._, 1894, S. 717.
Footnote 912:
_München. med. Wchnschr._, 1900, S. 1193.
Footnote 913:
_Encyclop. Jahrbücher_, Wien, 1900, Bd. IX, S. 203.
Footnote 914:
“Grundriss der Hygiene,” Leipzig, 1889, S. 487.
Footnote 915:
“Grundriss der Hygiene,” Leipzig, 4^{te} Anfl., 1897, S. 507.
Footnote 916:
“Einführung in das Studium der Bakteriologie,” Leipzig, 1890, S. 146.
Footnote 917:
“Einführung in das Studium der Bakteriologie,” 5^{te} Aufl., 1898, S. 275.
Footnote 918:
“Traité de médecine” de Charcot, Bouchard, et Brissaud, 1891, t. I, pp. 219–230.
Footnote 919:
“Traité de médecine...,” 2^e éd., 1898, t. I, pp. 250–254.
Footnote 920:
_Centralbl. f. allg. Path. u. path. Anat._, Jena, 1894, Bd. V, S. 212.
Footnote 921:
Lubarsch u. Ostertag’s “Ergebnisse d. allg. Path. u. path. Anat.,” Wiesbaden, 1895, I. Abt., S. 384.
Footnote 922:
_Compt. rend. Soc. de biol._, Paris, 1900, p. 385.
Footnote 923:
“Ueber die Selbstordnung der Furchungszellen,” in _Berichte d. naturwiss. Vereins zu Innsbruck_, 1893, Bd. XXI.
Footnote 924:
Herbst, _Biol. Centralbl._, Erlangen, 1894, 1895, Bde. XIV, XV; Forssmann, Ziegler’s _Beitr. z. path. Anat._, Jena, 1898, Bd. XXIV, S. 56.
Footnote 925:
“The Relations of Clinical Medicine to Modern Scientific Development,” a discourse delivered at Liverpool in September, 1896. _Rev. scient._, Paris, 1896, 4^e sér. t. VI, p. 481; [_Rep. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci._, London, 1896, p. 3; _Brit. Med. Journ._, London, 1896, Vol. II, p. 733].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
Page Changed from Changed to
226 justified in thinking that the justified in thinking that the vibrionicidal property of the vibriocidal property of the blood blood
● Typos fixed; non-standard spelling and dialect retained. ● Used numbers for footnotes, placing them all at the end of the last chapter. ● Enclosed italics font in _underscores_. ● Enclosed blackletter font in =equals=. ● The caret (^) serves as a superscript indicator, applicable to individual characters (like 2^d) and even entire phrases (like 1^{st}). ● Subscripts are shown using an underscore (_) with curly braces { }, as in H_{2}O. ● HTML alt text was added for images that didn’t have captions.