chapter ii
., § 1 _sub finem_.
Footnote 110:
H. Hyvernat, _Un fragment inédit de la version sahidique du Nouveau Testament_ (Ephes. i. 6-ii. 8_b_). _Revue Biblique_, April 1900, pp. 248-253. The fragment is of the eighth or ninth century.
Footnote 111:
See also the Greek and Middle Egyptian manuscript published by Crum and Kenyon, referred to above, p. 70.
Footnote 112:
The dates of Ulfilas’ birth and death are uncertain. He certainly lived till autumn 381 or 383. The date of his life is variously given as 310-380 or 318-388. According to Kauffmann, the Synod at which Ulfilas was consecrated Bishop was that of Antioch, _De Encaeniis_, 341.
Footnote 113:
Or 1115 according to the Armenian reckoning.
Footnote 114:
Celsus’s polemic against Christianity has perished, but considerable fragments are embedded in Origen’s Reply. See _Ante-Nicene Christian Library_, vol. xxiii., (Clark, Edin.).
Footnote 115:
Clement of Alexandria cites Matt. xviii. 3 in four different ways. He quotes Matt. v. 45 six times, and only once accurately.
Footnote 116:
Petropol. gr. 254, formerly cited as Paris. coisl. 212, written in the year 1111, the oldest manuscript that Lagarde was able to use for his edition of the _Apostolic Constitutions_. Further examples of the untrustworthiness of manuscripts and printed editions will be found in the small print at the end of this section.
Footnote 117:
See extended note (2) at the end of the chapter, p. 149.
Footnote 118:
On the question whether Clement of Rome knew the second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, see J. H. Kennedy, _The Second and Third Epistles of St. Paul to the Corinthians_. London, 1900, p. 142 ff.
Footnote 119:
Westcott, _Canon_, Part I., c. ii. 7.
Footnote 120:
_Ibid._, Part II., c. i. 1.; c. ii. 4.
Footnote 121:
Ambrosiaster is the name given to the unknown writer of a Commentary on the Pauline Epistles, which till the time of Erasmus was attributed to Ambrose. In recent times Dom G. Morin has raised the question whether the writer may not be one Isaac, who is known to have lived in the papacy of Damasus. He was a Jewish convert to Christianity, and afterwards returned to his former faith. See Dom G. Morin, _L’Ambrosiaster et le juif converti Isaac, contemporain du pape Damase_, in the _Revue d’Histoire et de Littérature religieuses_, iv. 2 (1899), 112. This writer informs us that a new edition of the whole of Ambrosiaster will be brought out by A. Amelli on the basis of a very old manuscript from Monte Cassino. Morin believes that the text of this manuscript, in spite of its age, is “fortement retouché, dont on a éliminé la plupart des traits vraiment intéressants” (_ibid._, p. 121).
Footnote 122:
This reminds us of how Luther used to entreat the printers to let his writings stand as he wrote them.
Footnote 123:
Called 2^{pe} by Tischendorf, and numbered 81 in Westcott and Hort, and 565 in _TiGr._ Mark of this manuscript was edited by Belsheim in 1885, with a collation of the other three Gospels. It is a valuable cursive, as appears from what is said of it in W-H: “The most valuable cursive for the preservation of Western readings in the Gospels is 81, a St. Petersburg manuscript called 2^{pe} by Tischendorf, as standing second in a list of documents collated by Muralt. It has a large ancient element, in great measure Western, and in St. Mark its ancient readings are numerous enough to be of real importance.” See above, under Codex N, p. 68.
Footnote 124:
The First Part has been issued: _A Textual Commentary upon the Holy Gospels_. Part I. St. Matthew, Division I., cc. i.-xiv. (London, Bell, 1899). See notice by Gwilliam in _The Critical Review_, May 1900. In this work Origen is also cited for Matt. v. 44.
Footnote 125:
In the _Expository Times_ for October 1897, p. 13 ff., I have called attention to another instance in which a Scriptural quotation (Isaiah lii. 5) is given with remarkable similarity in the _Apostolic Constitutions_, with its original (i. 10, iii. 5, vii. 204), in Ignatius (_Ad Trallianos_, viii.), and in 2nd Clement (c. xiii.). Similar things are to be observed even in the N.T., as, _e.g._, in Mark i. 2, where a quotation from Malachi iii. 1 is inserted between the heading, “In the prophet Isaiah,” and the words taken from that book. But they are found also in the writings of Paul, which has led to the view that he may possibly have used some sort of dogmatic anthology of the O. T. Clement of Alexandria has a good many quotations from Philo. On his quotations from the Gospels, see P. M. Barnard, _The Biblical Text of Clement of Alexandria in the Four Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles_. _Texts and Studies_, v. 5, Cambridge, 1899.
Footnote 126:
See below, Appendix II., Ἀντίγραφα.
Footnote 127:
_Vide infra_, Appendix I.
Footnote 128:
Fasciculus i., edited by Hauler, 1900.
##