chapter 47.
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/25717_
"Before long the adherents of the archbishop were guilty of a more atrocious and unprovoked crime, of the guilt of which a deep suspicion attached to Cyril. All Alexandria respected, honoured, took pride in the celebrated Hypatia. She was a woman of extraordinary learning; in her was centred the lingering knowledge of that Alexandrian Platonism cultivated by Plotinus and his school. Her beauty was equal to her learning; her modesty commended both. … Hypatia lived in great intimacy with the præfect Orestes; the only charge whispered against her was that she encouraged him in his hostility to the patriarch. … Some of Cyril's ferocious partisans seized this woman, dragged her from her chariot, and with the most revolting indecency tore her clothes off and then rent her limb from limb."
_H. H. Milman, History of Latin Christianity, book 2, chapter 3._
ALSO IN _C. Kingsley, Hypatia._
ALEXANDRIA: A. D. 616. Taken by Chosroes.
See EGYPT: A. D. 616-628.
ALEXANDRIA: A. D. 641-646. The Moslem Conquest.
The precise date of events in the Moslem conquest of Egypt, by Amru, lieutenant of the Caliph Omar, is uncertain. Sir William Muir fixes the first surrender of Alexandria to Amru in A. D. 641. After that it was reoccupied by the Byzantines either once or twice, on occasions of neglect by the Arabs, as they pursued their conquests elsewhere. The probability seems to be that this occurred only once, in 646. It seems also probable, as remarked by Sir W. Muir, that the two sieges on the taking and retaking of the city—641 and 646—have been much confused in the scanty accounts which have come down to us. On the first occasion Alexandria would appear to have been generously treated; while, on the second, it suffered pillage and its fortifications were destroyed. How far there is truth in the commonly accepted story of the deliberate burning of the great Alexandrian Library—or so much of it as had escaped destruction at the hands of Roman generals and Christian patriarchs—is a question still in dispute. Gibbon discredited the story, and Sir William Muir, the latest of students in Mahometan history, declines even the mention of it in his narrative of the conquest of Egypt. But other historians of repute maintain the probable accuracy of the tale told by Abulpharagus—that Caliph Omar ordered the destruction of the Library, on the ground that, if the books in it agreed with the Koran they were useless, if they disagreed with it they were pernicious.
See MAHOMETAN CONQUEST: A. D. 640-646.
{41}
ALEXANDRIA: A. D. 815-823. Occupied by piratical Saracens from Spain.
See CRETE: A. D. 823.
ALEXANDRIA: A. D. 1798. Captured by the French under Bonaparte.
See FRANCE: A. D. 1798 (MAY-AUGUST).
ALEXANDRIA: A. D. 1801-1802. Battle of French and English. Restoration to the Turks.
See FRANCE: A. D. 1801-1802.
ALEXANDRIA: A. D. 1807. Surrendered to the English. The brief occupation and humiliating capitulation.
See TURKS: A. D. 1806-1807.
ALEXANDRIA: A. D. 1840. Bombardment by the English.
See TURKS: A. D. 1831-1840.
ALEXANDRIA: A. D. 1882. Bombardment by the English fleet. Massacre of Europeans. Destruction.
See EGYPT: A. D. 1875-1882, and 1882-1883.
----------ALEXANDRIA: End----------
ALEXANDRIA, LOUISIANA, The Burning of.
See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1864 (MARCH-MAY: LOUISIANA).
ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA., A. D. 1861 (May). Occupation by Union troops. Murder of Colonel Ellsworth.
See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1861 (MAY: VIRGINIA).
ALEXANDRIAN TALENT.
See TALENT.
ALEXIS, Czar of Russia, A. D. 1645-1676.
ALEXIUS I. (Comnenus), Emperor in the East (Byzantine, or Greek), A. D. 1081-1118.
Alexius II. (Comnenus), Emperor in the East (Byzantine, or Greek), A. D. 1181-1183.
Alexius III. (Angelus), Emperor in the East (Byzantine, or Greek), A. D. 1195-1203
Alexius IV. (Angelus), Emperor in the East (Byzantine, or Greek), A. D. 1203-1204
Alexius V. (Ducas), Emperor in the East (Byzantine, or Greek), A. D. 1204.
ALFONSO ALFONSO I., King of Aragon and Navarre, A. D. 1104-1134
Alfonso I., King of Castile, A. D. 1072-1109; and VI. of Leon, A. D. 1065-1109.
Alfonso I., King of Leon and the Asturias, or Oviedo, A. D. 739-757.
Alfonso I., King of Portugal, A. D. 1112-1185.
Alfonso II., King of Aragon, A D. 1163-1196.
Alfonso II., King of Castile, A. D. 1126-1157.
Alfonso II., King of Leon and the Asturias, or Oviedo, A. D. 791-842.
Alfonso II., King of Naples, A. D. 1494-1495.
Alfonso II., King of Portugal, A. D. 1211-1223.
Alfonso III., King of Aragon, A. D. 1285-1291.
Alfonso III., King of Castile, A. D. 1158-1214.
Alfonso III., King of Leon and the Asturias, or Oviedo, A. D. 866-910.
Alfonso III., King of Portugal, A. D. 1244-1279.
Alfonso IV., King of Aragon, A. D. 1327-1336.
Alfonso IV., King of Leon and the Asturias, or Oviedo, A. D. 925-930.
Alfonso IV., King of Portugal, A. D. 1323-1357.
Alfonso V., King of Aragon and I. of Sicily, A. D. 1416-1458; I. of Naples, A. D. 1443-1458.
Alfonso V., King of Leon and the Asturias, or Oviedo, A. D. 9919-1027.
Alfonso V., King of Portugal, A. D. 1438-1481.
Alfonso VI., King of Portugal, A. D., 1656-1667.
Alfonso VII., King of Leon, A. D. 1109-1126.
Alfonso VIII., King of Leon, A. D. 1126-1157.
Alfonso IX., King of Leon, A. D. 1188-1230.
Alfonso X., King of Leon and Castile, A. D. 1252-1284.
Alfonso XI., King of Leon and Castile, A. D. 1312-1350.
Alfonso XII., King of Spain, A. D. 1874-1885.
ALFORD, Battle of (A. D. 1645).
See SCOTLAND: A. D. 1644-1645.
ALFRED, called the Great, King of Wessex, A. D. 871-901.
ALGIERS AND ALGERIA.
"The term Algiers literally signifies 'the island,' and was derived from the original construction of its harbour, one side of which was separated from the land."
_M. Russell, History of the Barbary States, page 314._
For history, see BARBARY STATES.
ALGIHED, The.
The term by which a war is proclaimed among the Mahometans to be a Holy War.
ALGONKINS, OR ALGONQUINS, The.
See AMERICAN ABORIGINES: ALGONKIN FAMILY.
ALGUAZIL.
See ALCALDE.
ALHAMA, The taking of.
See SPAIN: A. D. 1476-1492.
ALHAMBRA, The building of the.
See SPAIN: A. D. 1238-1273.
ALI, Caliph, A. D. 655-661.
ALIA, Battle of the (B. C. 390).
See ROME: B. C. 390-347.
ALIBAMUS, OR ALIBAMONS, The.
See AMERICAN ABORIGINES: MUSKHOGEE FAMILY.
ALIEN AND SEDITION LAWS, The.
See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1798.
ALIGARH, Battle of (1803).
See INDIA: A. D. 1798-1805.
ALIWAL, Battle of (1846).
See INDIA: A D. 1845-1849.
ALJUBAROTA, Battle of (1385).
See PORTUGAL: A. D. 1383-1385, and SPAIN: A. D. 1368-1479.
ALKMAAR, Siege by the Spaniards and successful defense (1573).
See NETHERLANDS: A. D. 1573-1574.
ALKMAR, Battle of.
See FRANCE: A. D. 1799 (SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER).
"ALL THE TALENTS," The Ministry of.
See ENGLAND: A. D. 1801-1806, and 1806-1812.
ALLEGHANS, The.
See AMERICAN ABORIGINES: ALLEGHANS.
ALLEMAGNE.
The French name for Germany, derived from the confederation of the Alemanni.
See ALEMANNI: A. D. 213.
ALLEN, Ethan, and the Green Mountain Boys.
See VERMONT, A. D. 1749-1774.
And the Capture of Fort Ticonderoga.
See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1775 (MAY).
ALLERHEIM, Battle of (or Second battle of Nördlingen,—1645.)
See GERMANY: A. D. 1640-1645.
ALLERTON Isaac, and the Plymouth Colony.
See MASSACHUSETTS (PLYMOUTH): A. D. 1623-1629. and after.
ALLIANCE, The Farmers'.
See UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: A. D. 1877-1891.
{42}
ALLOBROGES, Conquest of the.
The Allobroges (see ÆDUI; also GAULS) having sheltered the chiefs of the Salyes, when the latter succumbed to the Romans, and having refused to deliver them up, the proconsul Cn. Domitius marched his army toward their country, B. C. 121. The Allobroges advanced to meet him and were defeated at Vindalium, near the junction of the Sorgues with the Rhone, and not far from Avignon, having 20,000 men slain and 3,000 taken prisoners. The Arverni, who were the allies of the Allobroges, then took the field, crossing the Cevennes mountains and the river Rhone with a vast host, to attack the small Roman army of 30,000 men, which had passed under the command of Q. Fabius Maximus Æmilianus. On the 8th of August, B. C. 121, the Gaulish horde encountered the legions of Rome, at a point near the junction of the Isere and the Rhone, and were routed with such enormous slaughter that 150,000 are said to have been slain or drowned. This battle settled the fate of the Allobroges, who surrendered to Rome without further struggle; but the Arverni were not pursued. The final conquest of that people was reserved for Cæsar.
_G. Long, Decline of the Roman Republic, volume 1, chapter 21._
ALMA, Battle of the.
See RUSSIA: A. D. 1854 (SEPTEMBER).
ALMAGROS AND PIZARROS, The quarrel of the.
See PERU: A. D. 1533-1548.
ALMANZA, Battle of (A. D. 1707).
See SPAIN: A. D. 1707.
ALMENARA, Battle of (A. D. 1710).
See SPAIN: A. D. 1707-1710.
ALMOHADES, The.
The empire of the Almoravides, in Morocco and Spain, which originated in a Moslem missionary movement, was overturned in the middle of the twelfth century by a movement of somewhat similar nature. The agitating cause of the revolution was a religious teacher named Mahomet ben Abdallah, who rose in the reign of Ali (successor to the great Almoravide prince, Joseph), who gained the odor of sanctity at Morocco and who took the title of Al Mehdi, or El Mahdi, the Leader, "giving himself out for the person whom many Mahometans expect under that title. As before, the sect grew into an army, and the army grew into an empire. The new dynasty were called Almohades from Al Mehdi, and by his appointment a certain Abdelmumen was elected Caliph and Commander of the Faithful. Under his vigorous guidance the new kingdom rapidly grew, till the Almohades obtained quite the upper hand in Africa, and in 1146 they too passed into Spain. Under Abdelmumen and his successors, Joseph and Jacob Almansor, the Almohades entirely supplanted the Almoravides, and became more formidable foes than they had been to the rising Christian powers. Jacob Almansor won in 1195 the terrible battle of Alarcos against Alfonso of Castile, and carried his conquests deep into that kingdom. His fame spread through the whole Moslem world. … With Jacob Almansor perished the glory of the Almohade. His successor, Mahomet, lost in 1211 [June 16] the great battle of Alacab or Tolosa against Alfonso, and that day may be said to have decided the fate of Mahometanism in Spain. The Almohade dynasty gradually declined. … The Almohades, like the Ommiads and the Almoravides, vanish from history amidst a scene of confusion the details of which it were hopeless to attempt to remember."
_E. A. Freeman, History and Conquests of the Saracens, lecture 5._
ALSO IN _H. Coppée, Conquest of Spain by the Arab-Moors, book 8, chapter 4_
See, also, SPAIN. A. D. 1146-1232.
ALMONACID, Battle of.
See SPAIN: A. D. 1809 (AUGUST-NOVEMBER).
ALMORAVIDES, The.
During the confusions of the 11th century in the Moslem world, a missionary from Kairwan—one Abdallah—preaching the faith of Islam to a wild tribe in Western North Africa, created a religious movement which "naturally led to a political one." "The tribe now called themselves Almoravides, or more properly Morabethah, which appears to mean followers of the Marabout or religious teacher. Abdallah does not appear to have himself claimed more than a religious authority, but their princes Zachariah and Abu Bekr were completely guided by his counsels. After his death Abu Bekr founded in 1070 the city of Morocco. There he left as his lieutenant his cousin Joseph, who grew so powerful that Abu Bekr, by a wonderful exercise of moderation, abdicated in his favour, to avoid a probable civil war. This Joseph, when he had become lord of most part of Western Africa, was requested, or caused himself to be requested, to assume the title of Emir al Momenin, Commander of the Faithful. As a loyal subject of the Caliph of Bagdad, he shrank from such sacrilegious usurpation, but he did not scruple to style himself Emir Al Muslemin, Commander of the Moslems. … The Almoravide Joseph passed over into Spain, like another Tarik; he vanquished Alfonso [the Christian prince of the rising kingdom of Castile] at Zalacca [Oct. 23, A. D. 1086] and then converted the greater portion of Mahometan Spain into an appendage to his own kingdom of Morocco. The chief portion to escape was the kingdom of Zaragossa, the great out-post of the Saracens in northeastern Spain. … The great cities of Andalusia were all brought under a degrading submission to the Almoravides. Their dynasty however was not of long duration, and it fell in turn [A. D. 1147] before one whose origin was strikingly similar to their own" [the Almohades].
_E. A. Freeman, History and Conquests of the Saracens, lecture 5._
ALSO IN _H. Coppée, Conquest of Spain by the Arab-Moors, book 8, chapter 2 and 4_.
See, also, PORTUGAL: EARLY HISTORY.
ALOD. ALODIAL.
"It may be questioned whether any etymological connexion exists between the words odal and alod, but their signification applied to land is the same: the alod is the hereditary estate derived from primitive occupation; for which the owner owes no service except the personal obligation to appear in the host and in the council. … The land held in full ownership might be either an ethel, an inherited or otherwise acquired portion of original allotment; or an estate created by legal process out of public land. Both these are included in the more common term alod; but the former looks for its evidence in the pedigree of its owner or in the witness of the community, while the latter can produce the charter or· book by which it is created, and is called bocland. As the primitive allotments gradually lost their historical character, as the primitive modes of transfer became obsolete, and the use of written records took their place, the ethel is lost sight of in the bookland. All the land that is not so accounted for is folcland, or public land."
_William Stubbs, Constitutional History of England, chapter 3, section 24, and chapter 5, section 36._
{43}
"Alodial lands are commonly opposed to beneficiary or feudal; the former being strictly proprietary, while the latter depended upon a superior. In this sense the word is of continual recurrence in ancient histories, laws and instruments. It sometimes, however, bears the sense of inheritance. … Hence, in the charters of the eleventh century, hereditary fiefs are frequently termed alodia."
_H. Hallam, Middle Ages, chapter 2, part 1, note._
ALSO IN _J. M. Kemble, The Saxon in England, book 1, chapter 11._
See, also, FOLCLAND.
ALP ARSLAN, Seljouk Turkish Sultan, A. D. 1063-1073.
ALPHONSO.
See ALFONSO.
ALSACE. ALSATIA: The Name.
See ALEMANNI: A. D. 213.
ALSACE: A. D. 843-870. Included in the Kingdom of Lorraine.
See LORRAINE: A. D. 843-870.
ALSACE: 10th Century. Joined to the Empire.
See LORRAINE: A. D. 911-980.
ALSACE: 10th Century. Origin of the House of Hapsburg.
See AUSTRIA: A. D. 1246-1282.
ALSACE: A. D. 1525. Revolt of the Peasants.
See GERMANY: A. D. 1524-1525.
ALSACE: A. D. 1621-1622. Invasions by Mansfeld and his predatory army.
See GERMANY: A. D. 1621-1623.
ALSACE: A. D. 1636-1639. Invasion and conquest by Duke Bernhard of Weimar. Richelieu's appropriation of the conquest for France.
See GERMANY: A. D. 1634-1639.
ALSACE: A. D. 1648. Cession to France in the Peace of Westphalia.
See GERMANY: A. D. 1648.
ALSACE: A. D. 1659. Renunciation of the claims of the King of Spain.
See FRANCE: A. D. 1659-1661.
ALSACE: A. D. 1674-1678. Ravaged in the Campaigns of Turenne and Condé.
See NETHERLANDS (HOLLAND): A. D. 1674-1678.
ALSACE: A. D. 1679-1681. Complete Absorption in France. Assumption of entire Sovereignty by Louis XIV. Encroachments of the Chamber of Reannexation. Seizure of Strasburg. Overthrow of its independence as an Imperial City.
See FRANCE: A. D. 1679-1681.
ALSACE: A. D. 1744. Invasion by the Austrians.
See AUSTRIA: A. D. 1743-1744.
ALSACE: A. D. 1871. Ceded to the German Empire by France.
See FRANCE: A. D. 1871 (JANUARY-MAY).
ALSACE: 1871-1879. Organization of government as a German Impanel Province.
See GERMANY: A. D. 1871-1879.
----------ALSACE: End----------
ALTA CALIFORNIA. Upper California.
See CALIFORNIA: A. D. 1543-1781.
ALTENHElM, Battle of (A. D. 1675).
See NETHERLANDS (HOLLAND): A. D. 1674-1678.
ALTENHOVEN, Battle of (1793).
See FRANCE: A. D. 1793 (FEBRUARY-APRIL).
ALTHING, The.
See THING;
Also, NORMANS.—NORTHMEN: A. D. 860-1100;
And SCANDINAVIAN STATES (DENMARK-ICELAND): A. D. 1849-1874.
ALTIS, The.
See OLYMPIC FESTIVAL.
ALTMARCK.
See BRANDENBURG: A. D. 1142-1152.
ALTONA: A. D. 1713. Burned by the Swedes.
See SCANDINAVIAN STATES (SWEDEN): A. D. 1707-1718.
ALTOPASCIO, Battle of (1325).
See ITALY: A. D. 1313-1330.
ALVA IN THE NETHERLANDS.
See NETHERLANDS: A. D. 1566-1568 to 1573-1574.
AMADEO, King of Spain, A. D. 1871-1873.
AMAHUACA, The.
See AMERICAN ABORIGINES: ANDESIANS.
AMALASONTHA, Queen of the Ostrogoths.
See ROME: A. D. 535-553.
AMALEKITES, The.
"The Amalekites were usually regarded as a branch of the Edomites or 'Red-skins'. Amalek, like Kenaz, the father of the Kenizzites or 'Hunters,' was the grandson of Esau (Gen. 36: 12, 16). He thus belonged to the group of nations,—Edomites, Ammonites, and Moabites,—who stood in a relation of close kinship to Israel. But they had preceded the Israelites in dispossessing the older inhabitants of the land, and establishing themselves in their place. The Edomites had partly destroyed, partly amalgamated the Horites of Mount Seir (Deuteronomy 2: 12); the Moabites had done the same to the Emim, 'a people great and many, and tall as the Anakim' (Deuteronomy 2: 10), while the Ammonites had extirpated and succeeded to the Rephaim or 'Giants,' who in that part of the country were termed Zamzummim (Deuteronomy 2: 20; Gen. 14: 5). Edom however stood in a closer relation to Israel than its two more northerly neighbours. … Separate from the Edomites or Amalekites were the Kenites or wandering 'smiths.' They formed an important Guild in an age when the art of metallurgy was confined to a few. In the time of Saul we hear of them as camping among the Amalekites (1. Samuel 15: 6.) … The Kenites … did not constitute a race, or even a tribe. They were, at most, a caste. But they had originally come, like the Israelites or the Edomites, from those barren regions of Northern Arabia which were peopled by the Menti of the Egyptian inscriptions. Racially, therefore, we may regard them as allied to the descendants of Abraham. While the Kenites and Amalekites were thus Semitic in their origin, the Hivites or 'Villagers' are specially associated with Amorites."
_A. H. Sayce, Races of the Old Testament,