Part 3

Although situated about 20 miles north and the same distance east of Mt. Carmel, the bird-fauna was entirely the same, allowing for differences in the character of the country, the environs of Wheatland being much less varied, and therefore not such as to attract so great a variety of species. Nearly all the characteristic summer birds found further south were abundant near Wheatland, however, even _Peucæa illinoensis_ occurring there. Among the more numerous species were the Cerulean, Blue-winged Yellow, Kentucky and Prothonotary Warblers, all of which were quite as numerous as near Mt. Carmel. At the time of my arrival, the most abundant bird was probably the Cardinal Grosbeak, it being no unusual sight to see several males at one time along the railroad track, picking up grain dropped from passing cars, while the swamp and surrounding woods were filled with their sweet but monotonous whistlings. Later in the season, however, other species became rather more numerous, it being difficult to decide between the Redstart and Red-eyed Vireo, as to first rank in point of numbers. Other species almost as well represented as those mentioned, were the Red-headed Woodpecker, Tufted Titmouse, Blue Jay, and Red-winged Blackbird, and, for a brief season, the Rose-breasted Grosbeak and Cedarbird. Hawks were very plentiful, especially the Red-shouldered and Red-tailed, and on one occasion eight of the former (all adults) were observed soaring about, near together, uttering their clamorous cries. Barred Owls were exceedingly numerous among the trees growing in the swamp, and at night afforded much amusement by their “family squabbles.” Ducks and Geese which had been very plenty on the pond during the winter, had gone northward prior to the middle of April, except a few Mallards, Shovellers, and Blue-winged Teal, which remained until about the end of the month, as did also multitudes of Coots (_Fulica americana_).

The following list of course includes only a small proportion of the total number of species observed.

GRAY-CHEEKED THRUSH (_Hylocichla aliciæ_).—The exact date of arrival of this species was not noted, but was somewhere near the 20th of April. During the last week of April and the first three weeks of May it was very common, perhaps more so than any other of the small Thrushes. Specimens were shot May 23, and others were observed as late as the 28th of that month, the date of my departure.

TAWNY THRUSH (_Hylocichla fuscescens_).—Arrived April 21 and remained until toward the last of May. Less common than _H. aliciæ_ but frequenting the same localities and having nearly identical manners.

BEWICK’S WREN (_Thryomanes bewicki_).—Rather common, found only about the out-buildings of farms and in the village.

HOUSE WREN (_Troglodytes aëdon_).—Less common than Bewick’s Wren, and noticed only about brush-heaps and along old fences.

PROTHONOTARY WARBLER (_Protonotaria citrea_).—Very abundant among the “elbow-brushes” (_Cephalanthus occidentalis_) and willows in the pond, nesting in hollows of the latter.

BLUE-WINGED YELLOW WARBLER (_Helminthophaga pinus_).—Very abundant among the undergrowth in thick woods, chiefly in the bottoms.

GOLDEN-WINGED WARBLER (_Helminthophaga chrysoptera_).—Not uncommon for a few days during the early part of May.

TENNESSEE WARBLER (_Helminthophaga peregrina_). As usual, very numerous for several days, arriving May 7.

NASHVILLE WARBLER (_Helminthophaga ruficapilla_).—Rather rare during the middle portion of May, arriving about the 6th.

CAPE MAY WARBLER (_Perissoglossa tigrina_). Probably not uncommon, four specimens being obtained, all shot from the top branches of tall trees, and not recognized until after being shot.

BLACK-AND-YELLOW WARBLER (_Dendrœca maculosa_).—Much the most abundant of the migratory species.

BAY-BREASTED WARBLER (_Dendrœca castanea_).—Rather common for a few days.

BLUE WARBLER (_Dendrœca cærulea_).—Very abundant summer resident, first noticed about the 25th of April. Diligent search failed to discover a single nest, though pairs evidently having nests were met with on every hand through the woods.

YELLOW-THROATED WARBLER (_Dendrœca dominica albilora_).—Unaccountably rare, only two having been obtained, and one or two others heard. I am at a loss to account for the scarcity of this species, unless it be the rarity of sycamore (_Platanus_) trees in the locality under consideration.

Since there is evidently a general misapprehension of the characters distinguishing this race from true _D. dominica_, it may be as well to state here that the latter is larger, with a _constantly and very decidedly longer bill_, while the yellow over the lores is _never absent_. Var. _albilora_ frequently has the yellow over the lores almost as distinct as in typical _dominica_, but the bill is always much smaller, and somewhat differently shaped.

PINE-CREEPING WARBLER (_Dendrœca pinus_).—Rather rare.

PRAIRIE WARBLER (_Dendrœca discolor_).—Heard singing among the bushes in an old field on the day of my arrival, and frequently afterward.

CONNECTICUT WARBLER (_Oporornis agilis_).—Not uncommon about the middle of May, but very shy. Frequented the borders of the swamp, and escaped into the thick button-bushes when surprised.

KENTUCKY WARBLER (_Oporornis formosa_).—One of the most abundant of the summer residents.

MOURNING WARBLER (_Geothlypis philadelphia_).—Became suddenly very common May 6. Frequented chiefly brush-piles and old fences. Most of the specimens observed were males in fine plumage.

BLACK-CAPPED YELLOW WARBLER (_Myiodioctes pusillus_).—Rare during migration.

CANADA FLYCATCHING WARBLER (_Myiodioctes canadensis_).—One of the most numerous of the migratory species; first noted April 18, but not common until a week later.

HOODED WARBLER (_Myiodioctes mitratus_).—Rather common in deep woods, but much less so than in the vicinity of the Cypress swamp, further south.

SOLITARY VIREO (_Lanivireo solitarius_).—Rare.

CEDARBIRD (_Ampelis cedrorum_).—Exceedingly numerous among the willows in the swamp, where feeding upon the larvæ of _Diabrotica 12–maculata_ infesting these trees.

SUMMER REDBIRD (_Pyranga æstiva_).—Rather common, but owing to the comparative absence of high, dry woods, much less so than near Mt. Carmel. A female, killed at the same shot with her mate, resembled the male except in the tint of the red, which was of a brick-red rather than vermilion, the male also being in the parti-colored plumage of the immature bird, the red occupying, in both male and female, one-half or more of the plumage. The ovaries of the female were well developed.

GRASS FINCH (_Poœcetes gramineus_).—Common in the meadows, a nest with four eggs being taken April 30.

LARK FINCH (_Chondestes grammica_).—Rather common, chiefly in fields near roadsides.

WHITE-CROWNED SPARROW (_Zonotrichia leucophrys_).—Became common about the middle of May.

WHITE-THROATED SPARROW (_Zonotrichia albicollis_).—Very abundant up to the middle of May, and a female was started among some bushes near the edge of the swamp about the 27th or 28th of the month, her actions and notes strongly suggesting a nest in the vicinity, but I was unable to discover one.

FIELD SPARROW (_Spizella pusilla_).—A very common bird. Remarkable variations were noticed in the song of this species, several individuals repeating the usual song three times without stopping. Another had such peculiar notes that it was followed and shot for a strange bird.

OAK-WOODS SPARROW (_Peucæa æstivalis illinoensis_).—Rare, and observed only on one occasion, on the 26th of April. The locality was a “woods pasture,” about one-half cleared of trees, with occasional old logs and brush-piles on the open portion, and plenty of dead standing trees, the ground high and rolling. Immediately upon sighting the locality I thought of this bird, and at almost the same instant heard one sing. This one was shot, as he sat upon a brush-pile. Two or three others were heard at a distance, but I failed to discover them.

LINCOLN’S SPARROW (_Melospiza lincolni_).—Very abundant about brush-piles in swampy clearings.

CARDINAL GROSBEAK (_Cardinalis virginianus_). By far the most numerous of the resident _Fringillidæ_, and one of the most abundant of all birds. It was a very common thing to hear several males singing at the same time, and I once saw three males and two females near together on the railroad track, picking up grain scattered from the cars.

ROSE-BREASTED GROSBEAK (_Zamelodia ludoviciana_).—Exceedingly common during the greater part of the month of May. The first were seen April 25. They were most numerous among the willows in the swamp, engaged in feeding upon a small green beetle (_Diabrotica 12–maculata_) which infested the trees. They were also common in the sugar-maple groves, and were in full song during their stay.

BLUE GROSBEAK (_Guiraca cærulea_).—A single specimen seen but not obtained (date forgotten).

BRONZED GRACKLE (_Quiscalus purpureus æneus_).—Very numerous, breeding among the willows in the swamp. The “love note” of this bird is decidedly more metallic and more musical than that of _Q. purpureus_.

RED-HEADED WOODPECKER (_Melanerpes erythrocephalus_).—Much the most numerous of the Woodpeckers.

BARRED OWL (_Strix nebulosa_).—Exceedingly numerous, the swamp resounding at night with their hootings.

COOPER’S HAWK (_Accipiter cooperi_).—Common, breeding.

RED-SHOULDERED HAWK (_Buteo lineatus_).—Much the most numerous of the Hawks. On one occasion eight adults were observed circling together overhead, all uttering their clamorous cries.

MOURNING DOVE (_Zenaidura carolinensis_).—Abundant. All the specimens shot had the ends of the toes frozen off, showing that they had remained during the past severe winter.

WILD TURKEY (_Meleagris gallopavo americana_).—Common. Scarcely a day but what one or more were seen, and on one occasion a flock of fourteen was met with. When surprised they fly into the swamp, where, alighting on the trees, they are secure from pursuit. The inhabitants pay no attention whatever to the game laws, and it is owing entirely to the safe retreat afforded by the swamp that the Turkeys have not been more nearly exterminated.

VIRGINIA QUAIL (_Ortyx virginiana_).—Almost exterminated by the severe winter of 1880–81.

GREEN HERON (_Butorides virescens_).—Abundant. A small colony had their nests in a second-growth thicket, some distance from the swamp. The nests (seven in number) were placed in saplings at 12–15 feet from the ground, and, with two exceptions, contained five eggs each.

YELLOW-CROWNED NIGHT HERON (_Nyctherodius violaceus_).—Abundant, a colony of perhaps a hundred pairs having their nests among the tall ash and sweet-gum trees in a creek bottom, near the edge of the pond. The nests were mostly at a considerable height, and few of them readily accessible. They had just begun to lay, and were frightened away from the locality during a “wet spell” by squirrel hunters. A female was shot from her nest April 27, and a perfect egg cut from her oviduct. Several fine specimens of the bird were secured, and it was noticed that the delicate, almost luminous, yellowish buff of the forehead very soon faded.

AMERICAN WOODCOCK (_Philohela minor_).—Common, breeding.

SOLITARY SANDPIPER (_Rhyacophilus solitarius_).—Common, and undoubtedly breeding, about small ponds in the woods.

SORA RAIL (_Porzana carolina_).—Common among the sedges in the swamp.

FLORIDA GALLINULE (_Gallinula galeata_).—Probably common in the swamp. A fine specimen with its neck broken was picked up on the railroad track near the depot in Vincennes, having been killed by flying against the telegraph wires.

AMERICAN COOT (_Fulica americana_).—Exceedingly numerous in the swamp during latter half of April and early part of May, but toward the last of the latter month the greater part had disappeared.

MALLARD (_Anas boscas_).—Very numerous at the time of our arrival and for a week or two afterward. A few pairs are said to breed in the swamp.

SHOVELLER DUCK (_Spatula clypeata_).—Much the most numerous of the Ducks at the time of my arrival (April 15).

BLUE-WINGED TEAL (_Querquedula discors_).—Abundant, even up to the latter part of May, and undoubtedly breeding.

SUMMER DUCK (_Aix sponsa_).—Common and breeding in the swamp.

HOODED MERGANSER (_Lophodytes cucullatus_).—More common than _A. sponsa_, breeding, like that species, in hollow trees in the swamp.

THICK-BILLED GREBE (_Podilymbus podiceps_).—Very common in the swamp, where it was breeding.

At the time of my arrival the Ducks had mostly departed for the North, while the Geese had entirely disappeared. Both had passed the winter in the swamp, in immense numbers. A thorough exploration of the swamp would no doubt have added largely to the list of Water Birds, but I could not afford the time and labor necessary to accomplish even a partial exploration after the birds had begun breeding.

NOTES ON THE HABITS AND CHANGES OF PLUMAGE OF THE ACADIAN OWL (_NYCTALE ACADICA_), WITH SOME ADDITIONAL RECORDS OF ITS BREEDING IN MASSACHUSETTS.

BY WILLIAM BREWSTER.

In the Bulletin for July, 1881, I gave an account of the breeding of the Acadian Owl at Tyngsboro’, Massachusetts, with a description of a set of eggs taken there by Mr. Perham on April 5. Early in June of the same season Mr. Perham sent me a brood of four young Saw-whets which he had taken from the nest about the 15th of the preceding month. They were all in the plumage of _N. “albifrons,”_ and showed little individual variation, save in respect to size, the two females being slightly larger than their brothers. In their fresh, silky feathering they were beautiful little creatures, the warm sepia-brown of the upper parts harmonizing well with the rich fulvous beneath, and their white foreheads showing in strong contrast with both. Nor were their manners less engaging than their plumage, for, unlike most Owls, they were perfectly gentle from the first, never attempting to bite or scratch those who handled them. With each other they were really affectionate, often going through a caressing performance with their bills, and showing a mutual forbearance at meal-times which was very pleasing. They eat all kinds of meat with avidity, but seemed especially fond of mice. The latter were invariably skinned and the flesh torn in shreds and devoured, the skins being swallowed afterwards as dessert. I often saw them eject those peculiar pellets of bones, fur, and other indigestable fragments which all Owls and many Hawks are in the habit of depositing about their haunts. The operation was a peculiar one. The Owl would gape several times, then the head would be violently shaken sideways, and finally the pellet, coated with mucous, would shoot forth, frequently falling several inches in front of the spot where the bird was sitting. After it was all over the little fellow assumed an expression of relief and contentment which was very comical.

Although not less grave and solemn than other Owls, their movements were much more animated and restless. They were continually flying or hopping from place to place, even in the day-time, and they had a frequent habit of oscillating the head, at the same time lengthening and shortening the neck. This was apparently done for the purpose of fixing the exact position of some distant object, as afterwards the bird usually flew to the top of some door or book-case towards which its eyes had evidently been directed. Their only cry at this time was a shrill bat-like squeaking, which was frequently given by all four at once. Altogether they were unusually interesting pets and when the time came for preparing three of them as specimens, I found it very hard to break up the affectionate and attractive little family.

I believe it is now generally admitted by ornithologists, that the so called “_N. albifrons_” is simply the young of _N. acadica_. Indeed, Mr. Ridgway satisfactorily settled this point when he cited[9] the testimony of Dr. J. W. Velie of Chicago who kept a live “_albifrons_” “until it moulted and became a fine specimen of _Nyctale acadica_.” But as no one seems to have published a detailed account of the transition it may be worth while to briefly record some observations made on the survivor of the brood just mentioned.

This bird was placed in a large cage where it had abundant room to fly about, and was kept well supplied with food. Through June and July there was absolutely no change in its plumage, but on August 1 I noticed a few medially spotted feathers pushing their way through the uniformly brown ones of the fore part of the crown. Through the next two weeks they gradually increased and developed until the full-face aspect of the head was that of an adult Saw-whet. At this stage there was no indication of any second plumage on the other parts, but about August 15 a few streaked feathers appeared along the central line of the breast and abdomen, while a little later the moult began over the back and wings and quickly became general. Through the last two weeks of the month the new plumage gained daily, and by Sept. 1 the final stage was perfected and the bird had become a remarkably beautiful Saw-whet Owl. From this it appears that the “_albifrons_” condition is simply the first plumage, which in the Saw-whet is apparently better defined (as contrasted with the earlier downy stage and later autumnal plumage), as well as longer worn, than in most other Owls.

The specimen just mentioned is still (at the date of this writing, Dec. 1) alive and well. It has become rather wilder and less gentle than formerly, and lately has acquired a habit of swelling its plumage and snapping the bill when closely approached. Shortly after the moult it began a new cry, which is now frequently heard at night and occasionally also in the day-time. This utterance consists of a series of five or six low, chuckling but nevertheless whistled calls, which remind one of that peculiar, drawling soliloquy sometimes indulged in by a dejected hen on a rainy day. I cannot reconcile these notes with descriptions of the saw-filing ones which are supposed to have given the species its name, but they perhaps represent the unfinished performance of a young bird. The bat-like squeaking was discontinued before the bird began to whistle, and has never since been heard.

At the time of writing the article already referred to I received the impression that the nest then mentioned was the only one that Mr. Perham had found. But I have since learned that, including the two taken the present season, he has actually examined no less than seven during the past ten years, all of which occurred in or near the township of Tyngsboro’. Most of these nests were, however, broken up by red squirrels before the full complement of eggs was laid. The nesting places were usually of the artificial sort which I have already described, but occasionally use was made of a deserted Flicker’s hole. Mr. Perham frequently hears the notes of Saw-whets during the month of March, and believes that many pairs breed about Tyngsboro’ every season. The region is a heavily wooded one and apparently offers exceptional attractions to all kinds of Raptorial birds.

DESCRIPTION OF A NEW RACE OF _PEUCÆA RUFICEPS_ FROM TEXAS.

BY NATHAN CLIFFORD BROWN.

=Peucæa ruficeps eremœca.=[10] General aspect dull gray. Dorsal region grayish-ash, the feathers brownish centrally and with their shafts almost black. Top of head rufous, much admixed with grayish. A black frontlet, divided at the culmen by a white line, as in _ruficeps_ and var. _boucardi_. Breast and sides clear gray. Abdomen whitish. Crissum and flanks tinged with fulvous. A black maxillary stripe. Length of fresh specimen, 6.25; extent, 8.62; wing and tail about 2.75. Sexes alike.

The above description characterizes a bird very unlike _Peucæa ruficeps_ both in size and in coloration. It is much larger and entirely lacks the peculiar rufous tint of the upper parts seen in _P. ruficeps_. Var. _boucardi_, which is simply a larger race of _ruficeps_, the present form therefore resembles only in size and in the distribution of its markings. Indeed it is so unlike both described races that, but for thorough investigations by Mr. Robert Ridgway which fail to justify such a procedure, I should urge the claims of the new form to specific rank. Mr. Ridgway has with great kindness made a careful comparison of several of my specimens with all accessible material bearing upon the matter, and writes me that he finds the former insufficiently differentiated from _ruficeps_, through _boucardi_, to stand as a species. An interesting fact, incidentally brought to light by Mr. Ridgway, is that of the few Mexican examples upon which Dr. Sclater based his _Zonotrichia boucardi_, those from Orizaba are apparently referable to the race I have named _eremœca_. The National Museum possesses one of the three original Orizaba skins.

The specimens above described were taken, during the months of Dec., 1879 and Jan., Feb., and March, 1880, at Boerne, Kendall Co., Texas. Some account of their habits may be found on another page of the present number of the Bulletin.

ON KENNICOTT’S OWL AND SOME OF ITS ALLIES, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF A PROPOSED NEW RACE.

BY WILLIAM BREWSTER.

Since the date of its first description in 1867, Kennicott’s Owl (_Scops asio kennicotti_) has remained a very rare bird, and ornithologists have gained but little additional knowledge regarding either its distribution or variations of color. The prominent characters of Elliot’s type were its large size and tawny or umber-brown plumage, and as the few specimens subsequently recognized have closely resembled it, this peculiar coloring has come to be regarded as constant and diagnostic. But not long since Capt. Bendire sent me a Screech Owl from Fort Walla Walla, Washington Territory, which, although equaling _kennicotti_ in size and resembling it in some other respects, was colored more nearly like _S. asio_ in its gray dress. Being unable to reconcile the peculiarities of this bird with any of the standard descriptions, I set to work, at Capt. Bendire’s request, to bring together a sufficiently large number of specimens to determine its identity or relationship. In this I have at length succeeded, thanks to the kind assistance of Professor Baird and Mr. Ridgway of the National Museum, Mr. Allen of the Cambridge Museum of Comparative Zoölogy, Capt. Charles Bendire, U. S. A., Mr. H. W. Henshaw, Mr. Purdie and several other friends, all of whom have been most generous in placing their material at my disposal.

The series now before me comprises about fifty specimens, and includes representatives of all the known North American forms of _Scops_ except _S. flammeolus_. Among the number are two typical _kennicotti_, a fine suite of _asio_, illustrating its numerous variations of plumage, and no less than nine examples referable to the large gray form already mentioned as coming from Fort Walla Walla. A comparison of the latter with _asio_ and _kennicotti_ shows that while a few of the grayer specimens bear a strong superficial resemblance to _asio_ in its corresponding condition, the evidence of the series as a whole points to a stronger affinity with _kennicotti_. In regard to size, they are fully up to the standard of the latter, the difference from _asio_ in this respect being so decided that the smallest male of the series is considerably larger than any female which I have from the East. Moreover, the purely gray style is represented by only a small proportion of the number, the majority being more or less tinged with tawny-rufous, in this as well as some other respects indicating evident approaches to the supposed typical characteristics of _kennicotti_. In short, the intermediate character of several of these specimens is so unmistakable that, although the transition is not completely shown, they furnish ample evidence that the gray form actually does intergrade with brown _kennicotti_.

The bearing of this testimony is not doubtful. Geographical considerations preclude our regarding the two birds as allied races, for one of the most typical examples of _kennicotti_ comes from Idaho (No. 59,068 Coll. Nat. Mus., Dr. Whitehead), while I have a specimen referable to the gray condition from the coast of Oregon (Portland, Capt. Bendire), thus showing that they cannot be assigned different habitats. Clearly, then, the only alternative remaining is the assumption that _kennicotti_, like _asio_, is dichromatic, the purely gray birds from Fort Walla Walla representing the extreme of one phase, as the tawny brown type probably does that of the other. And considered in connection with its bearing on similarly variable allied forms, the hypothesis of dichromatism certainly offers a very easy and natural way out of the difficulty. Nor is there anything inconsistent in the fact that one or the other style apparently predominates in many sections of their mutual range, and in some is perhaps the exclusive representative, for a similar state of affairs is well known to obtain with other dichromatic members of this genus.[11]