Part 4
, pp. 298–336, Edinburgh, Scotland.
16. Reversionary Pseudobile Canaliculi Formation in the Cirrhotic Liver of a Vulpine Phalanger, by Fred D. Weidman, M.D. _New York Medical Journal_, March 9, 1918, New York.
17. A Contribution to the Anatomy and Embryology of _Cladorchis_ (_Stichorchis_) _Subtriquestrus_, Rudolphi, 1814 (Fischoeder, 1901), by Fred D. Weidman, M.D. _Parasitology_, Vol. X, No. 2, January 22, 1918, Cambridge University Press, London, England.
18. Nutritive and Blood Changes in Rats on Cancer-Inhibiting and Cancer-Stimulating Diets, by E. P. Corson-White, M.D. _Pennsylvania Medical Journal_, March, 1919, Vol. XXII, p. 348, Athens, Penna.
19. Pemphigus in an Orang Utan Infested with Strongyloides (intestinalis?) and Dying from Advanced Tuberculosis, by Fred D. Weidman, M.D. _Journal of Cutaneous Diseases_, March, 1919, Vol. XXXVII, pp. 169–173, Chicago, Ill.
20. Arteriosclerosis in Wild Animals, by Herbert Fox, M.D. _American Journal of Medical Sciences_, June, 1920, No. 6, Vol. CLIX, p. 821, Philadelphia, Penna.
21. Osteomalacia in Wild Animals, by E. P. Corson-White, M.D. _Archives of Internal Medicine_, November, 1922, Vol. 30, pp. 620–628, Chicago, Illinois.
22. Osteitis Deformans in Monkeys, by E. P. Corson-White, M.D. _Archives of Internal Medicine_, December, 1922, Vol. 30, pp. 790–796, Chicago, Illinois.
23. Certain Dermatoses of Monkeys and an Ape, by Fred D. Weidman, M.D. _Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology_, March, 1923, Vol. 7, pp. 289–302, Chicago, Illinois.
24. Acute Papular and Desquamative Exanthem in an Orang Utan, by Herbert Fox, M.D., and Fred D. Weidman, M.D. _Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology_, April, 1923, Vol. 7, pp. 462–464, Chicago, Illinois.
-----
Footnote 1:
Those who are interested in the subject of disease in its effect on evolution are referred to Morley Roberts, _Proceedings, Zoological Society, London_, 1918, p. 247.
Footnote 2:
_Proceedings, Zoological Society, London_, 1911.
Footnote 3:
_Proceedings, Zoological Society, London_, 1911, p. 425.
Footnote 4:
_Proceedings, Zoological Society, London_, 1911, p. 620.
Footnote 5:
_Br. Med. Jour._, 1910, 2, 1161.
Footnote 6:
_Proc. London Zool. Soc._, 1907.
Footnote 7:
Total is the number of individual animals showing lesions, not the sum of the listed changes.
Footnote 8:
_Comptes Rendus Soc. Biol._, T, 62–206.
Footnote 9:
This is done by determining the percentages of hypertrophy and dilatation for the total number of each class examined at autopsy.
Footnote 10:
_Arch. für. Ges. Physiologie_, 1908, 125, 507
Footnote 11:
dal Piaz: Papers from the Department of Anatomy, University of California, 1912. Bergmann: _Dissertation_, Munich, 1884. Loer: _Arch. f. die gesamte Physiologie_, 1911, V. 140–293. Grober: _Arch. f. die gesamte Physiologie_, 1908, V. 125–507. Grober: _Deutsch Archiv f. Klin. Med._, 1907, V. 91, 502. Welcher and Brandt: _Arch. für Anthropologie_, 1903, V. 28. Vierordt: _Tabellen_, 1906. Parrot: _Zoologischer Jahresbericht_, 1893. Hasenfeld and Romberg: _Arch. f. Exp. Path. und Pharmacol._, 1897, V. 39–333. Joseph: _Jour. Exp. Med._, 1908, V. 10–521.
Footnote 12:
These values are obtained in part from the literature, in part from our own specimens. At this laboratory the hearts of animals killed or dying from a short illness, organs showing no pathological change, were removed by cutting at the base of the vessels, washed free of blood and weighed. The weight of the whole animal was obtained after death.
Footnote 13:
These figures are obtained by determining mathematically the percentage of each feature in each class and then reducing the numbers to their lowest value.
Footnote 14:
_Verh. deutsch Path. Gesel._, 1906, X, 149.
Footnote 15:
With Coronary sclerosis only.
Footnote 16:
With Coronary sclerosis only.
Footnote 17:
_Proc. London Zool. Soc._, 1916.
Footnote 18:
_The Leucoses of Fowls_, London, 1922.
Footnote 19:
Lubarsch-Ostertag, _Ergeb. aus der Allg. Path._, 1908.
Footnote 20:
Vide Sisson’s _Veterinary Anatomy_ and Owen’s _Anatomy of the Vertebrates_.
Footnote 21:
Ball, _Jour. Vet._, 1907.
Footnote 22:
See Magnan, _Compt. Rendus d. l’ Acad. de Science_, 1910 and 1911, Vol. 150, 151, 152.
Footnote 23:
_C. R. Soc. de Biologie_, Paris, T. 73–526. _Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris Ann._, 1911, 492 et seq.
Footnote 24:
See Woodland, _Proc. London Zool. Soc._, 1906, and MacLeod, _Chemical and Physiological Medicine_, Chicago, 1923.
Footnote 25:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1905.
Footnote 26:
_Bull. Soc. Anat._, 1898, 73, 491
Footnote 27:
_Amer. Med._, 1903, 996
Footnote 28:
_Surg. Gyn. and Obst._, 1919, 28, p. 529.
Footnote 29:
_Jour. A.M.A._, 1921, 77, 194.
Footnote 30:
_Ibid._, 197.
Footnote 31:
Garrod, _Schorstein Lect._, 1920.
Footnote 32:
_Anatomical Record_, 1917, 13, p. 305, On the morphology of the renal tubule in the vertebrates.
Footnote 33:
Policard, _C. R. Assoc. Anat._, 1910, 12, 57.
Footnote 34:
Huber, _Anat. Record_, 1916, 10, 201.
Footnote 35:
_Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat._, 1911, 493 and 1912, 527, and C. R. Acad. Sc., 155, 182.
Footnote 36:
_C. R. Soc. Biol._, 1898, 5, 188.
Footnote 37:
_Monatsh._, 1893.
Footnote 38:
_Inaug. Diss. Giessen_, 1911.
Footnote 39:
_Arch. f. Tierheilk._, V. 38–99.
Footnote 40:
Comparative Anatomy of the Female Genitalia, _Am. Jour. of Obstet._, Vol. LXIV, No. 4, 1914. Mechanism of Labor from a Comparative Standpoint, _Ibid._, Vol. LXIX, No. 4, 1914. Dynamics of the Female Pelvis, its Evolution, etc., _Ibid._, Vol. LXXI, No. 1, 1915.
Footnote 41:
_Proc. L. Z. Soc._, 1919, p. 16.
Footnote 42:
_Journ. Phys._, Vol. 34, 295.
Footnote 43:
_Am. Jour. Phys._, Vol. 30, 129.
Footnote 44:
Carlson, Rooks and McKie, _Loc. cit._
Footnote 45:
Vincent and Jolly, _Loc. cit._
Footnote 46:
See Blair and Brooks, Osteomalacia of Primates in Captivity, _Ninth Annual Report, New York Zoological Society_, 1904, p. 135.
Footnote 47:
Campbell and Cleland, _Jour. Comp. Path. and Ther._, Vol. 32, p. 95.
Footnote 48:
_Med. Chir. Trans._, Vol. 60, 37, 1877.
Footnote 49:
_These de Lyon_, 1901.
Footnote 50:
_Verein Freibürger Aerzte_, May, 1902.
Footnote 51:
_Arch. f. Wiss. u. Prak. Tierhk._, Vol. 36, 652, 1910, and Vol. 39, 164, 1913.
Footnote 52:
_Vet. Med. Inaug. Diss. Giessen_, 1913.
Footnote 53:
_Traite d’ Anatomie Path._, 1883.
Footnote 54:
_Jour. Med. Res._, Vol. 24, 43, 1911.
Footnote 55:
_Publ. Jefferson Med. College_, Vol. 6, 1, 1915.
Footnote 56:
We have observed later, however, one case with very definite degenerative arterial disease; it will be discussed under the affections of the eye since the most definite and indeed only lasting sign of trouble was amblyopia, the attack being ushered in by a nondescript fit.
Footnote 57:
_Chemistry of the Proteins_, Mann.
Footnote 58:
_Ann. Inst. Past._, 1899, XIII, 558, and _Skandinavisches Arch. f. Physiol._, 1904, XVI, 249.
Footnote 59:
_Skandinavisches Arch. für Physiologie_, Vol. 17, p. 211, 1905.
Footnote 60:
_Jour. Physiologie et Path._, Vol. 14, 108, 1912.
Footnote 61:
_Carnegie Institute Publication_, No. 203, p. 247, 1915.
Footnote 62:
_Jour. Biol. Chem._, Vol. 14, p. 59, 1913.
Footnote 63:
_Publication of the Jefferson Medical College and Hospital_, Vol. 6, p. 1, 1915.
Footnote 64:
_These de Lyon_, 1901.
Footnote 65:
_Verein Freiburger Aerzte_, May 30, 1902.
Footnote 66:
_Vet. Med. Inaug. Diss. Giessen_, 1913.
Footnote 67:
_Chemistry of Food and Nutrition_, Macmillan, 1918.
Footnote 68:
Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bull., 295.
Footnote 69:
_Skandinavisches Archiv. f. Physiologie_, Vol. 17, p. 211, 1905.
Footnote 70:
_Bull._, 185, Experiment Station, U. S. Dept. Agriculture, 1907.
Footnote 71:
_Physiological and Pathological Chemistry_, Blakiston, 1902.
Footnote 72:
_Journ. Physiol._, 1912, XLIV, 425.
Footnote 73:
Die Vitamine und ihre Bedeutung für die Physiologie und Pathologie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Avitaminoses, Wiesbaden, 1914.
Footnote 74:
_Newer Knowledge of Nutrition_, Macmillan, 1919.
Footnote 75:
_Bull._, 34, Bureau of Amer. Ethnology.
Footnote 76:
_Jahrhuch. Kinderheilk._, 1904, LIX, 175.
Footnote 77:
_Journ. Am. Med. Assoc._, 1917, LXVIII, 1516.
Footnote 78:
_Arch. Path. Anat._, 1897, CXLVIII, 523.
Footnote 79:
_Lancet_, London, March 12, 1910, 733.
Footnote 80:
_Lancet_, London, 1911, II, 1266.
Footnote 81:
_Bull._, Dept. of Agriculture, Dec. 13, 1915.
Footnote 82:
Bureau of Animal Industry, 1895–96, 172.
Footnote 83:
_Z. Hyg. u. Infektionskrankh._, 1913, LXXV, 334.
Footnote 84:
_Jour. Biol. Chem._, 1917, XXXI, 229.
Footnote 85:
_Jour. Infect. Dis._, 1916, XIX, 478.
Footnote 86:
_Jour. A.M.A._, 1922, 79, 2132.
Footnote 87:
_Pflüger’s Arch._, 1909 (129), 63.
Footnote 88:
_Chemical Pathology_, Philadelphia, 1918.
Footnote 89:
These botanical names are taken from Chestnut’s _Poisonous Plants of America._
Footnote 90:
_Textbook of Histology_, 1920.
Footnote 91:
_Zeitch. für Krebsforsch_, Vol. 15, p. 1.
Footnote 92:
_Proceed. Phila. Path. Soc._, 1910, and _Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology_, Vol. XVII, 1912.
Footnote 93:
Figures in parentheses are numbers of animals with captivity known.
Footnote 94:
See Gould’s _Birds_, Vol. II, p. 83.
Footnote 95:
_Am. Jour. Med. Soc._, 1907, 133–769.
Footnote 96:
_Jour. Path. and Bact._, Vol. XVII, 1912.
Footnote 97:
Totals and percentages for class, including all members.
Footnote 98:
Grand Totals, all autopsies.
Footnote 99:
Totals used for analysis after deduction of cases insufficiently described.
Footnote 100:
_Rev. de Med. Vet._ T. 89, p. 221.
Footnote 101:
White and Fox, _Archives of Internal Medicine_, 1909, Vol. IV, p. 517.
Footnote 102:
The temperature in the axilla is often .5°F. higher than by rectum, but the difficulties of the axillary method render it impracticable.
Footnote 103:
A. E. Brown, _Proc. London Zool. Soc._, June, 1909, p. 81.
Footnote 104:
Simpson and Galbraith, _Trans. Royal Soc._, Edinburgh, XIV, p. 1, 65, 1906.
Footnote 105:
This term will be used in the following pages to mention the organism since by many persons it is better known than Nocardia and moreover describes the form better. I believe genus Nocardia is the correct nomenclature for reasons given on a subsequent page.
Footnote 106:
Those interested in the investigation of the cause of Blackhead are referred to the recent literature by Tyzzer and by Smith, in the _Jour. of Exp. Med._ and _Jour. of Med. Research_, 1918–1922.
Footnote 107:
There are certain exceptions to this, as with Nicoll’s (_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1912, p. 858) careful search for trematodes with sieves, but this means a separate research, and is incompatible with the all- round, general policies of present routine laboratory organization.
Footnote 108:
_Phila. Zool. Soc. Rep._, 1920, p. 28.
Footnote 109:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1910, p. 134.
Footnote 110:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1905, p. 252.
Footnote 111:
_Phila. Zool. Soc. Rep._, 1920, p. 29.
Footnote 112:
_Phila. Zool. Soc. Rep._, 1921, p. 31.
Footnote 113:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1919, p. 15.
Footnote 114:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1919, p. 15.
Footnote 115:
_Phila. Zool. Soc. Rep._, 1916–1921.
Footnote 116:
_Journal of Parasit._, June, 1921, p. 194.
Footnote 117:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1910, p. 147.
Footnote 118:
Fantham, _Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1910, p. 672.
Footnote 119:
_Loc. cit._, 1911, p. 674.
Footnote 120:
_Loc. cit._, 1915, p. 87.
Footnote 121:
_Loc. cit._, 1910, p. 233.
Footnote 122:
_Loc. cit._, 1914, p. 222.
Footnote 123:
_Phila. Zool. Soc. Rep._, 1912, p. 40.
Footnote 124:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1914, p. 140.
Footnote 125:
_Jour. Parasit._, June, 1921, Vol. VII, p. 198.
Footnote 126:
This figure and a number of others in the tables do not correspond with those in other sections of this book because certain injured, decomposed and newly arrived animals were available and accepted for my purposes, but were objectionable for the general medical statistics and therefore excluded.
Footnote 127:
For foot note see page 630.
Footnote 128:
For foot note see page 630.
Footnote 129:
Not generically diagnosed.
Footnote 130:
_Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila._, March, 1913, p. 127.
Footnote 131:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1912, p. 858.
Footnote 132:
_Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila._, 1913, p. 133.
Footnote 133:
_Proc. Roy. Soc. N. So. Wales_, Sydney, Vol. 27, pp. 86–90, 1893.
Footnote 134:
_Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus._, Wash., D. C., Vol. 50, 1916, p. 31.
Footnote 135:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1911, p. 674.
Footnote 136:
_Indian Med. Gaz._, June, 1913, p. 217.
Footnote 137:
_Jour. Trop. Med. Etc., London_, 1913, XVI, p. 334.
Footnote 138:
_Am. Med. Phila._, V. 6 (16), 1903, p. 611.
Footnote 139:
Eichhorn and Gallagher, _Jour. Inf. Dis._, XIX, No. 3, Sept., 1916, p. 395.
Footnote 140:
Macfie, _Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit._, 1915, 9, p. 507.
Footnote 141:
_Arch. f. Protistenk_, Jena, V. 26 (2), 22, July, p. 241.
Footnote 142:
_Jour. Parasit._, Sept., 1915, V. 2, pp. 37–45.
Footnote 143:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1919, p. 14.
Footnote 144:
_Jour. Parasit._, Dec., 1916, V. 3, pp. 82–89.
Footnote 145:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1909, p. 335.
Footnote 146:
_Loc. cit._, 1912, p. 236.
Footnote 147:
_Loc. cit._, 1912, p. 576.
Footnote 148:
The exact taxonomic position could not be stated,-probably an ameba.
Footnote 149:
_Proc. Zool. Soc. London_, 1910, p. 134.
Footnote 150:
Weidman (F. D.), “Dermatoses of Monkeys,” _Arch. Derm. and Syph._, Chicago, March, 1923, p. 289.
Footnote 151:
Railliet Traite de Zool. Med. et Agric. Paris—Asselin et Houzeau, 1895, p. 659.
Footnote 152:
Megnin, Les Parasites Articules, 1895, Masson et Cie, Paris.
Footnote 153:
Quoted by Jensen (V.), _Hospitalstidende_, Copenhagen, 1922, 65, No. 28, p. 457.
Footnote 154:
Centr. f. Bakt. u. Parasitk., (etc.), Jena 1—Abt. V. 35 (1), 5, 1903, orig. p. 89.
Footnote 155:
_Phila. Zool. Soc. Rep._, 1917, p. 36.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
● Typos fixed; non-standard spelling and dialect retained. ● Used numbers for footnotes, placing them all at the end of the last chapter. ● Enclosed italics font in _underscores_. ● Subscripts are shown using an underscore (_) with curly braces { }, as in H_{2}O.