Chapter v.

[97] For scientific analysis, with a succinct review of previous investigations, see W. M. Patterson, _The Rhythm of Prose_, New York, Columbia University Press, 1916. For the _clausula_ in particular see the summary of Zielinski in Sandys, _Companion to Latin Studies_, 655; Quintilian below, page 79; and M. W. Croll, _The cadence of English oratorical prose_. Studies in Philology, 16:1, University of North Carolina, January, 1919.

[98] That the classical rhetoric has so little to say of narrative rhythms is due not so much to the limited scope of ancient narrative as to the fact that these rhythms are considered properly in poetic. See page 30.