Chapter IV
.
Footnote 2070:
B.M. E 497; Schöne in _Comm. Phil. in hon. Mommseni_, p. 658, Nos. 29–32.
Footnote 2071:
_Op. cit._ p. 651, No. 5. In this and the other examples it will be understood that [Δ] denotes 10 (δέκα), [Π] 5 (πέντε), and so on; [Ͱ] being the sign for a drachma.
Footnote 2072:
_Op. cit._ No. 17.
Footnote 2073:
A diminutive of πέλλα, a large deep cup or bowl (see Vol. I. p. 186).
Footnote 2074:
Schöne, _op. cit._ p. 650, No. 3.
Footnote 2075:
_Ibid._ No. 7 = _Cat._ 1206.
Footnote 2076:
_Cat._ 2188; Schöne’s No. 8. The meaning of Λύδια μείζω is uncertain.
Footnote 2077:
_Ber. d. sächs. Gesellsch._ 1854, p. 36.
Footnote 2078:
B.M. B 310; Munich 693. See Jahn in _Ber. d. Sächs. Gesellsch._ 1854, p. 37.
Footnote 2079:
_Ran._ 1236.
Footnote 2080:
_Pac._ 1202.
Footnote 2081:
Schöne, _op. cit._ p. 655, No. 13.
Footnote 2082:
F 595: see Vol. I. p. 135.
Footnote 2083:
B.M. B 451; _J.H.S._ vi. p. 374 ff.
Footnote 2084:
B.M. B 450 = _J.H.S._ vi. p. 372.
Footnote 2085:
Boeckh, _C.I.G._ i. 545.
Footnote 2086:
A 1054 = Roehl, _I.G.A._ 524, p. 151. See also Kretschmer, pp. 3–4.
Footnote 2087:
_I.G.A._ 22: see below, p. 252.
Footnote 2088:
_Ibid._ 2 = B.M. A 1512.
Footnote 2089:
B.M. F 596: see Vol. I. p. 186.
Footnote 2090:
Heydemann’s _Cat._ 1212.
Footnote 2091:
B.M. F 605–6.
Footnote 2092:
_Naukratis I._, pls. 32–4, p. 54 ff.; _Naukratis II._, pl. 21, p. 62 ff.; _Brit. Sch. Annual_, 1898–99, p. 53.
Footnote 2093:
_Ath. Mitth._ xv. p. 395 ff.
Footnote 2094:
See Vol. I. pp. 139, 345.
Footnote 2095:
_Ath. Mitth._ 1881, p. 107; 1893, p. 225; Kretschmer, p. 110; also Vol. I. p. 291.
Footnote 2096:
_Mon. Grecs_, 1897, pls. 16–7, p. 55; and see Vol. I. p. 493.
Footnote 2097:
B.M. B 134; Urlichs, _Beiträge_, pl. 14.
Footnote 2098:
Berlin 2314.
Footnote 2099:
Examples in the B.M. are E 12 and E 457 (Pamphaios), E 61 (Hieron), E 65 (Brygos), E 258 (Euxitheos); and cf. Fig. 129.
Footnote 2100:
Perrot, _Hist. de l’Art_, iii. p. 670. They have been found at Larnaka, Paphos, Dali, and Amathus.
Footnote 2101:
Roberts, _Gk. Epigraphy_, i. p. 154.
Footnote 2102:
On the subject generally see Roberts, _Greek Epigraphy_, vol. i. (Cambridge Press).
Footnote 2103:
See the table given by Kretschmer, p. 105.
Footnote 2104:
See Hill, _Handbook of Greek and Roman Coins_, p. 208 ff.
Footnote 2105:
B.M. B 130.
Footnote 2106:
See for other details of coin-inscriptions Hill, _op. cit._
Footnote 2107:
_Cat. of Bronzes_, No. 250.
Footnote 2108:
No. 385 (Didot).
Footnote 2109:
It should be borne in mind that Mycenaean vases have been found in Argolis, Cyprus, and elsewhere, with characters _incised_ on the handles, of contemporaneous execution, and forming parallels to the Cretan script and the later Cypriote syllabary.
Footnote 2110:
_Olympia_, iv. pl. 39, p. 102.
Footnote 2111:
Roehl, _I.G.A._ 377.
Footnote 2112:
$1$2 1903, pls. 2–6: see Vol. I. p. 92.
Footnote 2113:
See also Vol. I. p. 335.
Footnote 2114:
_Jahrbuch_, 1891, p. 263; Kretschmer, p. 7.
Footnote 2115:
Vol. I. p. 297 and Plate XVI.; for the latest interpretation of the name, as here adopted, see _Class. Review_, 1900, p. 264.
Footnote 2116:
_E.g._ Ramsay in _J.H.S._ x. p. 187.
Footnote 2117:
Studniczka, _Kyrene_, p. 11 ff.; Vol. I. p. 342.
Footnote 2118:
Collected by Blass, _Dialektinschr._ iii. 3120 ff., and Wilisch, _Altkorinthische Thonindustrie_, p. 156.
Footnote 2119:
Roberts (_Gk. Epigraphy_, i. p. 134) distinguishes three periods in the Corinthian alphabet from 700 to 400 B.C., but the vases seem to belong almost entirely to the first, down to 550 B.C.
Footnote 2120:
Vol. I. p. 316, Fig. 90.
Footnote 2121:
_Cat._ 1655: see Vol. I. p. 319.
Footnote 2122:
Louvre E 600 = Reinach, i. 395.
Footnote 2123:
B.M. A 1080 = Reinach, i. 306.
Footnote 2124:
Athens 620 = Reinach, i. 394.
Footnote 2125:
Roehl, _I.G.A._ 20, 5.
Footnote 2126:
_Ibid._ 20, 63.
Footnote 2127:
E 638 = _Mon. dell’ Inst._ 1855, pl. 20. It has been suggested that the name is originally a corruption of _Alexandra_ = Xandra = Ksandra = Kesandra (Kretschmer, p. 28).
Footnote 2128:
The general peculiarities of the Corinthian alphabet are not touched on here, as examples have been given of all characteristic letters. See Roberts, _Gk. Epigraphy_, i. p. 134.
Footnote 2129:
Kretschmer, p. 51; Roehl, _I.G.A._ p. 14, No. 22.
Footnote 2130:
See Vol. I. p. 300; Klein, _Meisters._ p. 30; _Boston Mus. Report_, 1898, p. 54, 1899, p. 56; _Röm. Mitth._ 1897, p. 105.
Footnote 2131:
_Ath. Mitth._ 1892, pl. 6, p. 101.
Footnote 2132:
_Ath. Mitth._ 1890, p. 411.
Footnote 2133:
See Vol. I. p. 357; Karo in _J.H.S._ xix. p. 156; _Ath. Mitth._ 1900, p. 93, note.
Footnote 2134:
_Auserl. Vasenb._ 205, 3, 4: see Vol. I. p. 357.
Footnote 2135:
See Vol. I. p. 322 and Kretschmer, p. 62.
Footnote 2136:
_Rev. Arch._ xl. (1902), p. 41.
Footnote 2137:
As is often the case with English seventeenth-century inscriptions.
Footnote 2138:
_Frag. Com. Gr._ (_Script. Gr. Bibl._, xlii.), p. 248.
Footnote 2139:
_Notizie degli Scavi_, 1903, p. 34.
Footnote 2140:
For the language spoken by the μέτοικοι cf. Kretschmer, p. 76, and Philostratus, _Vit. Soph._ ii. 1, 14; also Plat. Lys. 223_a_, ὑποβαρβαρίζοντες παιδαγωγοί.
Footnote 2141:
Naples 3089 = Millingen-Reinach, 33–4.
Footnote 2142:
Bibl. Nat. 372 = Reinach, i. 92.
Footnote 2143:
Bibl. Nat. 846 = Klein, _Lieblingsinschr._^2 p. 129.
Footnote 2144:
Hartwig, _Meistersch._ p. 320; Dümmler in _Berl. Phil. Woch._ 1888, p. 20; Kretschmer, p. 81.
Footnote 2145:
Ar. _Thesm._ 1084–1225.
Footnote 2146:
Kretschmer also hints that it seems to indicate the pronunciation of Φ by the Athenians as PH in “hap-hazard,” not as F.
Footnote 2147:
There are also isolated instances of ἔγραφε; Timonidas of Corinth, Pheidippos, Euthymides, and Aristophanes. See Klein, _Meisters._ p. 13.
Footnote 2148:
B.M. F 594.
Footnote 2149:
Gardner, _Ashmolean Vases_, No. 189, pl. 26: Εκεράμευσεν ἐμὲ Οἰκυφέλης. We are reminded of the jest about Chairestratos made by the comic poet Phrynichos, who speaks of “Chairestratos soberly pottering (κεραμεύων) at home” (Athen. xi. 474 B).
Footnote 2150:
See list at end of chapter, and Klein, _op. cit._ pp. 49, 213, 214.
Footnote 2151:
Munich 378 = Furtwaengler and Reichhold, pl. 14. See Vol. I. p. 428.
Footnote 2152:
Klein, _Meistersig._ p. 111.
Footnote 2153:
G 107: see _Monuments Piot_, ix. p. 33.
Footnote 2154:
Naples 3415.
Footnote 2155:
Munich 498 = Reinach, i. 215.
Footnote 2156:
_Cat._ 1152.
Footnote 2157:
Munich 380, 810 = Reinach, ii. 115, i. 363.
Footnote 2158:
Louvre E 852 = Reinach, i. 156.
Footnote 2159:
Reinach, ii. 292.
Footnote 2160:
_E.g._ B.M. F 62.
Footnote 2161:
See also Kretschmer, p. 84.
Footnote 2162:
_E.g._ B.M. B 164, B 254; Louvre F 297 = Reinach, ii. 26.
Footnote 2163:
Kretschmer, p. 85: see p 92.
Footnote 2164:
Munich 6: see Vol. I. p. 428, and Hoppin, _Euthymides_, p. 18.
Footnote 2165:
_Monuments Piot_, ix. pl. 2.
Footnote 2166:
Berlin 1737.
Footnote 2167:
Munich 333 = Reinach, ii. 119.
Footnote 2168:
Berlin 1704 = Reinach, i. 198; Vol. I. p. 326.
Footnote 2169:
Berlin 1732 = Reinach, ii. 66.
Footnote 2170:
Plate XXIII.: see Vol. I. p. 326.
Footnote 2171:
Bibl. Nat. 219.
Footnote 2172:
Louvre F 385 = Millingen, _Anc. Uned. Mon._ pl. 38.
Footnote 2173:
Reinach, ii. 49.
Footnote 2174:
Kretschmer, p. 86.
Footnote 2175:
Reinach, ii. 128.
Footnote 2176:
Kretschmer, pp. 86, 197.
Footnote 2177:
See Kretschmer, p. 86.
Footnote 2178:
_Cat._ 1158 = _Ath. Mitth._ 1884, pl. 1.
Footnote 2179:
Kretschmer, _loc. cit._: cf. Bergk, _Poet. lyr. Gr._ iii.^4 p. 97, frag. 23.
Footnote 2180:
See Hartwig, _Meistersch._ p. 255.
Footnote 2181:
Petersburg 1670. The Doric dialect is explained by Kretschmer as due to the Sicilian origin of the game.
Footnote 2182:
_Sc._ “hard to beat.”
Footnote 2183:
Kretschmer, p. 88.
Footnote 2184:
_I.e._ κυβιστητῆρι.
Footnote 2185:
Reinach, i. 294. Probably, as Kretschmer points out, a dog of Melita off Illyricum, not of Malta.
Footnote 2186:
Kretschmer, p. 91.
Footnote 2187:
Benndorf, _Gr. u. sic. Vasenb._ pl. 1.
Footnote 2188:
Helbig, 186 = _Wiener Vorl._ 1889, pl. 8, 6.
Footnote 2189:
Reinach, i. 96.
Footnote 2190:
Reinach, i. 106.
Footnote 2191:
This translation is somewhat doubtful: see Reinach, _loc. cit._
Footnote 2192:
_Cat._ 688 = Reinach, i. 164.
Footnote 2193:
Reinach, i. 513.
Footnote 2194:
Athens 1241 = Dumont-Pottier, i. pl. 6.
Footnote 2195:
Plate XXXIX.
Footnote 2196:
On the form of the Δ see below, p. 268.
Footnote 2197:
_Brit. Sch. Annual_, 1898–99, p. 65.
Footnote 2198:
Reinach, i. 277: see on the subject, _Hermes_, 1898, p. 640; _Notizie degli Scavi_, 1895, 86 ff.; and above, pp. 115, 137.
Footnote 2199:
See on this subject, Urlichs, _Beiträge_, p. 33 ff., and Vol. I. p. 389.
Footnote 2200:
Athen. xi. 466 D; not found on Attic vases, but cf. B.M. F 548.
Footnote 2201:
B.M. B 415, 422; Berlin 1775–76.
Footnote 2202:
Berlin 1764; Munich 37. For variations see Kretschmer, p. 195.
Footnote 2203:
See Klein, _Meisters._ p. 110; Kretschmer, p. 82.
Footnote 2204:
Instances are B.M. B 330, B 339, B 631, E 182, E 718.
Footnote 2205:
_E.g._ B.M. B 400.
Footnote 2206:
_Cat._ 334 = Reinach, i. 79. The vase is probably by Charinos.
Footnote 2207:
Cf. the story of Pericles and Sophocles told by Cicero, _De Offic._ i. 40, 144.
Footnote 2208:
_Vasen mit Lieblingsinschriften_, 2nd edn., 1898. Of these, 528 are masculine names, and only 30 feminine.
Footnote 2209:
143 ff. There is, of course, a play here on the word ἐραστής.
Footnote 2210:
97 ff. Demos is here a proper name; κημός means the ballot-box, in which the juries recorded their votes.
Footnote 2211:
Cf. Frazer’s note on Paus. vi. 10, 6 (vol. iv. p. 37).
Footnote 2212:
Such as the Laches καλός on Berlin 2314, a name which recalls the Platonic dialogue with that title.
Footnote 2213:
Hartwig, _Meistersch._ pl. 17, 1.
Footnote 2214:
Reinach, ii. 94.
Footnote 2215:
Hartwig in _Mélanges d’Arch._ 1894, p. 10 note.
Footnote 2216:
The name of Leagros occurs on many vases by Euphronios and other artists: see Klein, _Lieblingsinschr._^2 p. 70 ff.
Footnote 2217:
Klein, _Lieblingsinschr._^2 p. 87 = _Ashmolean Vases_, No. 310.
Footnote 2218:
See for this section, Kretschmer, p. 94 ff.
Footnote 2219:
See Kretschmer, p. 98.
Footnote 2220:
See Vol. I. p. 326.
Footnote 2221:
But see p. 271 for the probable explanation of this use of ω.
Footnote 2222:
Kretschmer, p. 146.
Footnote 2223:
Naples 2899; B.M. E 156.
Footnote 2224:
Louvre F 53 = Reinach, ii. 59 (Exekias).
Footnote 2225:
Berlin 2291.
Footnote 2226:
Munich 340 = _C.I.G._ 7433.
Footnote 2227:
B.M. E 224; Karlsruhe 209: cf. Berlin 2184 ([ΟΡΕΣΣΤΕΣ]) and 1906 ([ΤΡΙΤΟΝΝΟΣ]).
Footnote 2228:
Kretschmer, p. 179.
Footnote 2229:
_Ibid._ p. 180.
Footnote 2230:
Munich 334.
Footnote 2231:
See generally Kretschmer, p. 110 ff.
Footnote 2232:
The two Proto-Attic inscribed vases (Berlin 1682 and _Art. Denkm._ i. 57: see Vol. I. p. 293).
Footnote 2233:
Berlin 2008; _Röm. Mitth._ 1886, p. 21.
Footnote 2234:
See the table given by Kretschmer, p. 105.
Footnote 2235:
See Vol. I. p. 443, and Dümmler’s article in _Jahrbuch_, 1887, p. 168 ff.
Footnote 2236:
See Kretschmer, p. 211 ff.
Footnote 2237:
For the proof that Assteas and Python worked at Paestum, see Vol. I. p. 479.
Footnote 2238:
The name is perhaps a by-form of Dasimos (see Vol. I. p. 478). The correspondence of D and L is not uncommon, as in δακρύς = _lacrima_.
Footnote 2239:
F 62, [ΤΕΡΜΩΝ]; F 92, [ΟΡΕΣΣΤΑΣ]. See also Millingen-Reinach, pls. 14, 17, 18.
Footnote 2240:
Cf. the version given by Eustathius _ad Odyss._ p. 1698, 25.
Footnote 2241:
Kretschmer, p. 218; _Rev. Arch._ xii. (1888), p. 344.
Footnote 2242:
Rayet and Collignon, p. 330 (in Louvre): see above, p. 186; also Vol. I. p. 488.
Footnote 2243:
One kylix in partnership with Nikosthenes.
Footnote 2244:
In one case as potter for Epiktetos.
Footnote 2245:
See also Vol. I. p. 440.
## PART IV
ITALIAN POTTERY
##