Part 1
Produced by Louise Hope, Taavi Kalju and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain material from the Google Print project.)
[This e-text includes characters that require UTF-8 (Unicode) file encoding:
œ : “oe” ligature Ȝȝ, ƿ, ſ, ǽ : yogh, wynn, long s, accented æ (only in notes)
These characters, as well as a single Greek phrase, occur only in the notes, not in the poem itself. If any of the characters do not display properly, or if the apostrophes and quotation marks in this paragraph appear as garbage, make sure your text reader’s “character set” or “file encoding” is set to Unicode (UTF-8). You may also need to change the default font. As a last resort, use the Latin-1 version of the file instead.
The original book (EETS E.S. 4, 1868, ed. Skeat) exists in at least two forms. See Errata section at the end of the e-text for details.
In the main text, footnotes are grouped at the end of text sections. Most headnotes have similarly been moved to the nearest break in the text. Sidenotes keep their original starting point, but are collected into full sentences.
_Typography:_
Large initial capitals are shown with a single leading + to avoid “breaking” the text:
+Herknet to me, gode men Wiues, maydnes, and alle men ...
Italicized letters representing expanded contractions are shown in br{ac}es. All other italics are shown conventionally with _lines_; this includes italicized _w_, used by the editor for wynn ƿ. If you find the braces distracting you may delete them globally; they are not used for any other purpose.
A few French passages in the Preface use a trailing tilde ~, as in the word “q~”. In the original, the ~ was attached to the preceding letter, but not directly above it. Superscript letters are shown with a caret ^.
Square brackets are in the original except those in standard formulas such as [Footnote] or [Transcriber’s Note].]
THE LAY OF HAVELOK THE DANE.
Early English Text Society. Extra Series. No. IV. 1868.
Dublin: William McGee, 18, Nassau Street. Edinburgh: T. G. Stevenson, 22, South Frederick Street. Glasgow: Ogle & Co., 1, Royal Exchange Square. Berlin: Asher & Co., Unter den Linden, 20. New York: C. Scribner & Co.; Leypoldt & Holt. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co. Boston, U.S.: Dutton & Co.
+The Lay of+
+HAVELOK THE DANE:+
Composed in the Reign of Edward I, about A.D. 1280.
Formerly Edited by Sir F. Madden for the Roxburghe Club,
And now Re-Edited from the Unique Ms. Laud Misc. 108, in the Bodleian Library, Oxford;
by the
REV. WALTER W. SKEAT, M.A.,
Author of “A Mœso-Gothic Glossary,” Editor of “Piers Plowman,” “William of Palerne,” &c.
[Illustration: Seal of Great Grimsby]
LONDON: Published For The Early English Text Society, By N. Trübner & Co., 60, Paternoster Row.
MDCCCLXVIII.
+Extra Series,+ IV.
John Childs and Son, Printers.
CONTENTS.
TITLEPAGE. The engraving represents the seal of Great Grimsby, described in § 19 of the Preface, p. xxi.
PREFACE. § 1. The former edition of 1828. § 2. The present edition. § 3. Plan of this edition. § 4. Notices of the story by Early Writers: the longer French Version. § 5. The shorter French Version. § 6. Peter de Langtoft (1307). § 7. Rauf de Boun (1310). § 8. A Brief Genealogy, Herald’s Coll. MS. (ab. 1310). § 9. Metrical Chronicle (ab. 1313). § 10. Robert of Brunne (1338); ed. Hearne. § 11. Robert of Brunne; Lambeth MS. § 12. French Prose “Brute” (1332). § 13. English Prose “Brute,” MS. Harl. 2279. § 14. Gray’s Scala Cronica (ab. 1360). § 15. Eulogium Historiarum (1366). § 16. Henry de Knyghton (1395); Warner (1586); Webster (1617). § 17. Danish traditions. § 18. Lincolnshire traditions. § 19. Seal of Great Grimsby. § 20. Sketch of the French “Lai.” § 21. Gaimar’s abridgment. § 22. Sketch of the English Lay. § 23. Possible date of Havelok’s reign. § 24. Story of “Edwin of Deira.” § 25. On the names “Curan” and “Havelok.” § 26. Description of the MS. § 27. Grammatical forms in the Poem. § 28. On the metre. § 29. On the final _-e_, &c. i
EMENDATIONS, &c. liv
THE LAY OF HAVELOK 1
NOTES TO “HAVELOK” 87
GLOSSARIAL INDEX 105
INDEX OF NAMES 157
[Headnotes: _The full set has been duplicated here to act as a supplementary table of contents. Headnotes separated by / were continued across facing pages._
THE GOOD KING ATHELWOLD / IS KING OVER ALL ENGLAND. ATHELWOLD IS ABOUT TO DIE. HE SUMMONS HIS LORDS TO WINCHESTER. ATHELWOLD SELECTS EARL GODRICH / TO BE HIS DAUGHTER’S GUARDIAN. KING ATHELWOLD DIES. EARL GODRICH TAKES POSSESSION. GODRICH PLOTS AGAINST HIS WARD. BIRKABEYN IS KING OF DENMARK. BIRKABEYN SELECTS EARL GODARD / TO BE GUARDIAN OF HIS THREE CHILDREN. GODARD IMPRISONS THE THREE CHILDREN. GODARD KILLS SWANBORGUGH AND HELFLED. GODARD SPARES HAVELOK FOR A TIME. GODARD TELLS GRIM TO DROWN HAVELOK. HAVELOK IS TAKEN TO GRIM’S COTTAGE. GRIM SEES THAT HAVELOK IS THE KING’S SON. GRIM AND HIS WIFE FEED HAVELOK. GRIM SAYS HE HAS DROWNED HAVELOK. GRIM SETS SAIL FOR ENGLAND. GRIM FOUNDS THE TOWN OF GRIMSBY. HAVELOK DOES NOT LIKE BEING IDLE. HAVELOK SELLS FISH LIKE THE BEST. HAVELOK GOES TO LINCOLN TO GET WORK. HE HELPS THE EARL OF CORNWALL’S COOK. HAVELOK IS HIRED BY THE EARL’S COOK. HE CUTS WOOD, AND DRAWS WATER. HAVELOK GROWS VERY TALL AND STRONG. HE SEES SOME MEN “PUTTING THE STONE.” HE “PUTS THE STONE” FURTHER THAN ANY. GODRICH HEARS OF HAVELOK’S STRENGTH. GOLDBOROUGH IS SENT FOR TO LINCOLN. GODRICH ASKS HAVELOK IF HE WILL MARRY. HAVELOK RESOLVES TO GO TO GRIMSBY. GRIM’S CHILDREN WELCOME HAVELOK. GOLDBOROUGH SEES THE WONDROUS LIGHT. HAVELOK TELLS HER HIS STRANGE DREAM. SHE SAYS HAVELOK WILL BE A GREAT KING. HAVELOK PRAYS FOR VENGEANCE ON GODARD. HAVELOK ADDRESSES GRIM’S THREE SONS. HE ASKS THEM TO GO WITH HIM TO DENMARK. HAVELOK GIVES UBBE A GOLD RING. UBBE INVITES HAVELOK TO A FEAST. UBBE TAKES A GREAT FANCY TO HAVELOK. UBBE SENDS HAVELOK TO BERNARD. A GANG OF THIEVES BESET BERNARD’S HOUSE. THREE OF THE THIEVES ATTACK HAVELOK. HAVELOK SLAYS SEVEN OF THE THIEVES. THE THIEVES SHOOT AT HIM FROM A DISTANCE. HUGH AND THE REST COME TO THE RESCUE. ALL THE SIXTY THIEVES ARE SLAIN. UBBE ASKS BERNARD WHAT HAS HAPPENED. BERNARD RELATES HAVELOK’S PROWESS. THE OTHERS CONFIRM BERNARD’S STORY. UBBE SENDS FOR HAVELOK AND TAKES HIM TO HIS CASTLE. UBBE SEES THE MIRACULOUS LIGHT / WHICH ISSUES FROM HAVELOK’S MOUTH. THE LIGHT SHOWS THAT HAVELOK IS THE HEIR. UBBE SAYS HAVELOK SHALL BE KING. UBBE RELATES HAVELOK’S HISTORY. UBBE DOES HOMAGE TO HAVELOK. ALL SWEAR TO BE FAITHFUL TO HAVELOK. UBBE DUBS HAVELOK A KNIGHT. HAVELOK IS MADE KING OF DENMARK. HAVELOK GOES TO SEEK OUT GODARD. GODARD’S MEN ARE BEATEN. GODARD IS BOUND AND LED TO HAVELOK. HE IS CONDEMNED TO BE HUNG. GODARD IS FLAYED ALIVE AND HUNG. GODRICH RAISES AN ARMY AGAINST HAVELOK. GODRICH EXCITES THE ENGLISH AGAINST HAVELOK. THE ENGLISH MARCH TO GRIMSBY. COMBAT BETWEEN UBBE AND GODRICH. GODRICH DISPLAYS GREAT PROWESS. COMBAT BETWEEN GODRICH AND HAVELOK. GODRICH IS BOUND AND FETTERED. THE ENGLISH SUBMIT TO GOLDBOROUGH. GODRICH IS CONDEMNED TO BE BURNT. THE EARL OF CHESTER MARRIES GUNILD. HAVELOK REMEMBERS BERTRAM’S KINDNESS. BERTRAM MARRIES GRIM’S SECOND DAUGHTER. HAVELOK IS CROWNED KING OF ENGLAND. SUCH IS THE “GESTE” OF HAVELOK. SAY A PATERNOSTER FOR THE AUTHOR.]
PREFACE.
§ 1. The English version of the Lay of Havelok, now here reprinted, is one of the few poems that have happily been recovered, after having long been given up as lost. Tyrwhitt, in his Essay on the Language and Versification of Chaucer, has a footnote (No. 51) deploring the loss of the Rime concerning Gryme the Fisher, the founder of Grymesby, Hanelok [_read_ Havelok] the Dane, and his wife Goldborough; and Ritson, in his Dissertation on Romance and Minstrelsy--(vol. i. p. lxxxviii. of his Metrical Romanceës)--makes remarks to the same effect. It was at length, however, discovered by accident in a manuscript belonging to the Bodleian library, which had been described in the old Catalogue merely as _Vitæ Sanctorum_, a large portion of it being occupied by metrical legends of the Saints. In 1828, it was edited for the Roxburghe Club by Sir F. Madden, the title-page of the edition being as follows:-- “The Ancient English Romance of Havelok the Dane, accompanied by the French Text: with an introduction, notes, and a glossary, by Frederick Madden, Esq., F.A.S. F.R.S.L., Sub-Keeper of the MSS. in the British Museum. Printed for the Roxburghe Club, London. W. Nicol, Shakspeare Press, MDCCCXXVIII.” This volume contains a very complete Introduction, pp. i-lvi; the English version of Havelok, pp. 1-104; the French text of the Romance of Havelok, from a MS. in the Heralds’ College, pp. 105-146; the French Romance of Havelok, as abridged and altered by Geffrei Gaimar, pp. 147-180; notes to the English text, pp. 181-207; notes to the French text, pp. 208-210; and a glossary, &c., pp. 211-263. But there are sometimes bound up with it two pamphlets, viz. “Remarks on the Glossary to Havelok,” by S. W. Singer, and an “Examination of the Remarks, &c.,” by the Editor of Havelok. In explanation of this, it may suffice to say, that the former contains some criticisms by Mr Singer (executed in a manner suggestive of an officious wish to display superior critical acumen), of which a few are correct, but others are ludicrously false; whilst the latter is a vindication of the general correctness of the explanations given, and contains, incidentally, some valuable contributions to our general etymological knowledge, and various remarks which have proved of service in rendering the glossary in the present edition more exactly accurate.[1]
[Footnote 1: In particular, we find there a complete proof, supported by some fifty examples, that, _as_ can be traced, through the forms _ase_, _als_, _alse_, _also_, to the A.S. _eall-swa_; a proof, that in the difficult phrase _lond and lithe_, the word _lithe_ [also spelt _lede_, _lude_] is equivalent to the French _tenement_, _rente_, or _fe_; and, thirdly, a complete refutation of Mr Singer’s extraordinary notion that the adverb _swithe_ means _a sword_!]
§ 2. Owing to the scarcity of copies of this former edition, the committee of the Early English Text Society, having first obtained the approval of Sir Frederic Madden, resolved upon issuing a reprint of it; and Sir Frederic having expressed a wish that the duty of seeing it through the press should be entrusted to myself, I gladly undertook that responsibility. He has kindly looked over the revises of the whole work,[2] but as it has undergone several modifications, it will be the best plan to state in detail what these are.
[Footnote 2: In the same way, _William of Palerne_ was prepared by me for the press, subject to his advice; see _William of Palerne_, Introduction, p. ii.]
§ 3. With respect to the text, the greatest care has been taken to render it, as nearly as can be represented in print, an exact copy of the MS. The text of the former edition is exceedingly correct, and the alterations here made are few and of slight importance. Sir F. Madden furnished me with some, the results of a re-comparison, made by himself, of his printed copy with the original; besides this, I have myself carefully read the proof sheets with the MS. _twice_, and it may therefore be assumed that the complete correctness of the text is established. It seems to me that this is altogether the most important part of the work of a _Text_ Society, in order that the student may never be perplexed by the appearance of words having no real existence. For a like reason the letters þ and ƿ (the latter of which I have represented by an italic _w_) have now been inserted wherever they occur, and the expansions of abbreviations are now denoted by italics. For further remarks upon the text, see the description of the MS. below, § 26. Sidenotes and headlines have been added, but the numbering of the lines has not been altered. The French text of the romance, the title of which is _Le Lai de Aveloc_, and the abridgment of the story by Geffrei Gaimar, have not been here reprinted; the fact being, that the French and English versions differ very widely, and that the passages of the French which really correspond to the English are few and short. _All_ of these will be found in the Notes, in their proper places, and it was also deemed the less necessary to print the French text, because it is tolerably accessible; for it may be found either in vol. i. of Monumenta Historica Britannica, ed. Petrie, 1848, in the reprint by M. Michel (1833) entitled “Le Lai d’Havelok,” or in the edition by Mr T. Wright for the Caxton Society, 1850. An abstract of it is given at p. xxiii. The Notes are abridged from Sir F. Madden’s, with but a very few additions by myself, which are distinguished by being placed within square brackets. The Glossarial Index is, for the most part, reprinted from Sir F. Madden’s Glossary, but contains a large number of _slight_ alterations, re-arrangements, and additions. The references have nearly all been verified,[3] and the few words formerly left unexplained are now either wholly or partially solved. I have now only to add that a large portion of the remainder of this preface, especially that which concerns the historical and traditional evidences of the story (§ 4 to § 18), is abridged or copied from Sir F. Madden’s long Introduction, which fairly exhausts the subject.[4] All extracts included between marks of quotation are taken from it without alteration. But I must be considered responsible for the rearrangement of the materials, and I have added a few remarks from other sources.
[Footnote 3: I say _nearly_, because I have not been able to verify _every_ reference to _every_ poem quoted. I have verified and critically examined all the citations from the _poem itself_, from Ritson’s Romances, Weber’s Romances, Laȝamon, Beowulf, Chaucer, Langland, and Sir Walter Scott’s edition of Sir Tristrem (3rd edition, 1811).]
[Footnote 4: To this, the reader is referred for fuller information.]
§ 4. NOTICES OF THE STORY OF HAVELOK BY EARLY WRITERS. There can be little doubt that the tradition must have existed from Anglo-Saxon times, but the earliest mention of it is presented to us in the full account furnished by the French version of the Romance. Of this there are two copies, one of which belongs to Sir T. Phillipps; the other is known as the Arundel or Norfolk MS., and is preserved in the Heralds’ College, where it is marked E. D. N. No. 14; the various editions of the latter have been already enumerated in § 3. This version was certainly composed within the first half of the twelfth century. From the fact that it is entitled a _Lai_, and from the assertion of the poet--“Qe vn _lai_ en firent li Breton”--“whereof the Britons made a lay”--we easily conclude that it was drawn from a British source. From the evident connection of the story with the Chronicle called the _Brut_, we may further conclude that by _Breton_ is not meant Armorican, but belonging to _Britain_. The story is in no way connected with France; the tradition is British or Welsh, and the French version was doubtless written in England by a subject of an English king. That the language is French is due merely to the accident that the Norman conquerors of England had acquired that language during their temporary sojourn in France. From every point of view, whether we regard the British tradition, the Anglo-Norman version, or the version printed in the present volume, the story is wholly English. It is not to be connected too closely with the Armorican lays of Marie _de France_.[5]
[Footnote 5: “The word Breton, which some critics refer to Armorica, is here applied to a story of mere English birth.” Hallam; Lit. of Europe, 6th ed. 1860; vol. i. p. 36. See the whole passage.]
§ 5. We next come to the abridgment of the same as made by Geffrei Gaimar, who wrote between the years 1141 and 1151. In one place, Geffrei quotes Gildas as his authority, but no conclusion can easily be drawn from this indefinite reference. In another place, he mentions a feast given by Havelok after his defeat of Hodulf-- _si cum nus dit la verai estoire_-- “as the true history tells us.” As this feast is not mentioned in the fuller French version, and yet reappears in the English text, we perceive that he had some additional source of information; and this is confirmed by the fact that he mentions several additional details, also not found in the completer version. That the lay of Havelok, as found in Gaimar, is really his, and not an interpolation by a later hand, may fairly be inferred from his repeated allusions to the story in the body of his work. There are three MS. copies containing Gaimar’s abridgment, of which the best is the Royal MS. (Bibl. Reg. 13 A. xxi.) in the British Museum; the two others belong respectively to the Dean and Chapter of Durham (its mark being C. iv. 27) and to the Dean and Chapter of Lincoln (its mark being H. 18). It is curious that the Norfolk MS. contains not only the fuller French version of the story, but also the Brut of Wace, and the continuation of it by Gaimar. Gaimar’s abridgment, as printed in Sir F. Madden’s edition, is taken from the Royal MS., supplemented by the Durham and Lincoln MSS. See also Monumenta Historica Britannica, vol. i. p. 764. It is important to mention that Gaimar speaks of the Danes as having been in Norfolk since the time that Havelok was King, after he has been relating the combats between the Britons and the Saxons under the command of Cerdic and Cynric. Another allusion makes Havelok to have lived long before the year 800, according to every system of chronology.
§ 6. The next mention of Havelok is in the French Chronicle of Peter de Langtoft, of Langtoft in Yorkshire, who died early in the reign of Edward II., and whose Chronicle closes with the death of Edward I. Here the only trace of the story is in the mention of “Gountere le pere Hauelok, de Danays Ray clamez”--Gunter, father of Havelok, called King of the Danes. The allusion is almost valueless from its evident absurdity; for he confounds Gunter with the Danish invader defeated by Alfred, and who is variously called Godrum, Gudrum, Guthrum, or Gurmound. He must have been thinking, at the moment, of a very different Gurmund, viz. the King of the Africans, as he is curiously called, whose terrible devastations are described very fully in Laȝamon, vol. iii. pp. 156-177, and who may fairly be supposed to have lived much nearer to the time of Havelok; and he must further have confounded this Gurmund with Gunter. For the account of Robert of Brunne’s translation of Langtoft’s Chronicle, see below, § 10.
§ 7. But soon after this, we come to a most curious account. In MS. Harl. 902 is a late copy, on paper, of a Chronicle called _Le Bruit Dengleterre_, or otherwise _Le Petit Bruit_, compiled A.D. 1310, by Meistre Rauf de Boun, at the request of Henry de Lacy, earl of Lincoln. It is a most worthless compilation, put together in defiance of all chronology, but with respect to our present inquiry it is full of interest, as it soon becomes obvious that one of his sources of information is the very English version here printed, which he cites by the name of _l’estorie de Grimesby_, and which is thus proved to have been written before the year 1310. “The Chronicler,” says Sir F. Madden, “commences, as usual, with Brute, B.C. 2000, and after taking us through the succeeding reigns to the time of Cassibelin, who fought with Julius Cæsar, informs us, that after Cassibelin’s death came Gurmound out of Denmark, who claimed the throne as the son of the eldest daughter of Belin, married to Thorand, King of Denmark. He occupies the kingdom 57 years, and is at length slain at _Hunteton_, called afterwards from him _Gurmoundcestre_. He is succeeded by his son Frederick, who hated the English, and filled his court with Danish nobles, but who is at last driven out of the country, after having held it for the short space of 71 years. And then, adds this miserable History-monger: ‘Et si entendrez vous, que par cel primer venue de auaunt dit Roy Gormound, et puis par cele hountoux exil de son fitz Frederik, si fu le rancour de Daneis vers nous enpendaunt, et le regne par cel primere accion vers nous enchalangount plus de sept C auns apre, _iekis a la venue Haneloke, fitz le Roy Birkenebayne de Dannemarche, q~ le regne par mariage entra de sa femme_.’ --f. 2 b.
“After a variety of equally credible stories, we come to Adelstan II.[6] son of Edward [the Elder], who corresponds with the real king of that name, A.D. 925-941. He is succeeded by his son [brother] Edmund, who reigned four years [A.D. 941-946], and is said to have been _poisoned_ at Canterbury; after whom we have ADELWOLD, whose identity with the Athelwold of the English Romance, will leave no doubt as to the source whence the writer drew great part of his materials in the following passage:
‘Apres ceo vient Adelwold son fitz q~ reigna XVJ et demie, si engendroit ij feiz et iij filis, dount trestoutz murrirent frechement fors q~ sa pune file, le out a nom _Goldburgh_, del age de VJ aunz kaunt son pere Adelwold morust. Cely Roy Adelwold quant il doit morir, comaunda sa file a garder a vn Count de Cornewayle, al houre kaunt il quidou~ie (sic) hountousment auoir deparagé, quaunt fit _Haueloke_, fitz le Roy Byrkenbayne de Denmarche, esposer le, encountre sa volunté, q~ primis fuit Roy Dengleterre et de Denmarch tout a vn foitz, par quele aliaunce leis Daneis queillerunt g^{e}ndr~ (sic) mestrie en Engleterre, et long temps puise le tindrunt, _si cum vous nouncie l’estorie de Grimesby_, come _Grime_ primez nurist Haueloke en Engleterre, depuis cel houre q’il feut chasé de Denmarche &c. deqis al houre q’il vint au chastelle de Nichole, q~ cely auauntdit traitre _Goudriche_ out en garde, en quel chastel il auauntdit Haueloke espousa l’auauntdit Goldeburgh, q~ fuit heir Dengleterre. Et par cel reson tynt cely Haueloke la terre de Denmarche auxi comme son heritage, et Engleterre auxi par mariage de sa femme; et si entendrez vous, q~ par la reson q~ ly auauntdit Gryme ariua primez, kaunt il amena l’enfaunt Haueloke hors de Denmarche, par meyme la reson reseut cele vile son nom, de Grime, quel noun ly tint vnquore Grimisby.