Chapter IV
, _supra_.
Footnote 229:
I have taken the earliest date for which there is any probability, because it was in Hadrian’s time that most of the great Gnostics taught, and their speculations would therefore have been most likely to come to heathen ears. Keim, _Celsus Wahres Wort_, Zürich, 1873, however, makes the date of the book 177-178 A.D., and this seems supported by the latest critics. See Patrick, _Apology of Origen_, 1892, p. 9, where the question is thoroughly examined.
Footnote 230:
Origen, _cont. Cels._ Bk VI. c. 24.
Footnote 231:
See Matter, _Histoire du Gnosticisme_, Paris, 1843, Pl. III, and Giraud, _op. cit._ Pl. facing p. 238.
Footnote 232:
Origen, _cont. Cels_. Bk VI. c. 38. The fact is significant as showing that the Ophites considered the Son as contained _within_ the Father.
Footnote 233:
ἐπιγεγραμμένον διάφραγμα πελεκοιειδεῖ σχήματι, Origen, _op. et loc. cit._ The πέλεκυς or double-bladed axe was the symbol of Zeus Labrandos of Caria, and is often met with on the coins of Asia Minor, while it seems to have played a prominent part in the worship of Minoan Crete and in Mycenae. See Arthur Evans, _Mycenaean Tree and Pillar Cult_, 1901, pp. 8-12. Ramsay, _Cities_, etc., I. c. 91, thinks that Savazos or Sabazios was called in Phrygia Lairbenos, which may be connected with the word _Labrys_ said to be the name of the double axe. He found a god with this weapon worshipped together with Demeter or Cybele in the Milyan country, _op. cit._ pp. 263, 264, and he thinks the pair appear under the different names of Leto, Artemis, Cybele, and Demeter on the one hand, and Apollo, Lairbenos, Sabazios, Men, and Attis on the other throughout Asia Minor. He points out, however, that they were only the male and female aspects of a single divinity (_op. cit._ 93, 94). Is it possible that this is the explanation of the double axe as a divine symbol? The axe with one blade was the ordinary Egyptian word-sign for a god (see _P.S.B.A_. 1899, pp. 310, 311) and the double axe might easily mean a god with a double nature. If this idea were at all prevalent in Anatolia at the beginning of our era, it would explain Simon Magus’ mysterious allusion to the flaming sword of Genesis iii. 24, “which turns both ways to guard the Tree of Life,” and is somehow connected with the division of mankind into sexes. See Hippolytus, _op. cit._ Bk VI. c. 17, p. 260, Cruice. A very obscure Coptic text which its discoverer, M. de Mély, calls “Le Livre des Cyranides” (_C. R. de l’Acad. des Inscriptions_, Mai-Juin, 1904, p. 340) gives a hymn to the vine said to be sung in the Mysteries of Bacchus in which the “mystery of the axe” is mentioned.
Footnote 234:
Origen, _op. et loc. cit._ The names of the circles, etc., in the original are from above downwards: Ἀγάπη, Ζωή, Πρόνοια, Σοφίας, Γνῶσις, Σοφία, Φύσις, and Σύνεσις.
Footnote 235:
Gnosis does appear in the Naassene Psalm given in this Chapter, but only as the name of the “Holy Way.”
Footnote 236:
See n. 1, p. 58 _supra_.
Footnote 237:
In this it is following strictly the tradition of the Enochian literature. “And we ascended to the firmament, I and he, and there I saw Sammael and his hosts, and there was great fighting therein and the angels of Satan were envying one another.” Charles, _Ascension of Isaiah_, c. VII. v. 9, p. 48, and Editor’s notes for other references.
Footnote 238:
Origen, _cont. Cels._ Bk VI. c. 32. Horaios is probably connected with the root אור “light”; Astaphaios appears in the earliest texts as Astanpheus. which may be an anagram for στέφανος “crown.” Or it may be חשטפה “inundation” which would agree with Origen’s statement as to this being the principle of water, for which see p. 73 _infra_.
Footnote 239:
_Op. cit._ Bk VI. c. 31.
Footnote 240:
Unless we take the ten circles as including the three gates of Horaios, Ailoaios, and Astaphaios. In this case, Jaldabaoth and his first three sons would alone form the higher part of the planetary world. This is unlikely, but if it were so, there would be an additional reason for calling Jaldabaoth, as does Irenaeus, a “fourth number.” Theodore Bar Khôni, who wrote in the viiith century (see
##